• Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    46
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 month ago

    Quantumania wasn’t bad. It just wasn’t great. There are many Marvel and DC sequels that were worse both critically and financially.

    • ToriborA
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      1 month ago

      I’m torn because its inclusion feels like recency bias but I wonder if over time it will seem even more ill advised considering how much it does to try to set up a Kang storyline that never got off the ground.

    • grayhaze@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      We enjoyed Quantumania, but that could have been influenced by us watching it in a 4DX cinema. Sure there were issues, but it can’t really be criticised for setting up Kang as the next big bad as that was the plan at the time.

      • Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        1 month ago

        But the list is supposed to be the absolute worst sequels, not a random list of not great sequels.

        • MeekerThanBeaker@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 month ago

          Yeah… and Coming 2 America wasn’t as awful as many on that list. I was pleasantly surprised despite the stupid title name. No where near as good as the original, but better than expected.

          I can’t recall Star Trek Nemesis, but I’ve seen all the Star Trek films and I never thought any were bad enough to be put on this list.