• Lem Jukes@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 days ago

      I guess? But, how do you think the text part of text-to-image creation works?

  • ReCursing@lemmings.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    7 days ago

    I didn’t have much respect for MAD magazine to start with, always seemed to be generic boomer humour from what I’ve seen.

    • Kusimulkku@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      7 days ago

      At one point that generic boomer humor was new and cutting edge. It’s an old magazine with their heyday in the 70’s

    • JasonDJ@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      7 days ago

      I don’t like to call it boomer humor. That shit was funny in the 90s. For better or worse, it wasn’t the jokes that changed, it was our reaction to it.

      Thinking specifically of things like “Miss Swan”, “The ambiguously gay duo”, and “Pat”. Although I think only one of those was MAD. Still, we (as in the cisfolk, at least) thought it was funny enough at the time for it to keep getting aired.

      It’s boomer humor now because our sense of humor matured and adapted…and theirs didn’t.

  • Theo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 days ago

    Man, I haven’t had a MAD subscription in ages. I didn’t realize they were still in print. Lol

    • Dave@lemmy.nz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      31
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      7 days ago

      I don’t think this is real. If you search up the issue number you’ll see the real version. It’s also from 1974.

        • lunarul@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          7 days ago

          No, someone took an existing painting and modified it with copy/paste to show two middle fingers. Which is also ironic, given the message they’re trying to send.

        • Kusimulkku@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          7 days ago

          They’re republishing old editions with new covers. Dunno if this is one of those

      • Ledivin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        edit-2
        7 days ago

        Its not real.

        originally published

        MAD #166, Apr 1974

        lol yeah, otherwise MAD was WAAAAY ahead of its time 😂

        EDIT: huh, does lemmy not support nested quotes or am I just dumb

        • Tlaloc_Temporal@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 days ago

          I can see the different levels of quote, but there’s also spaces between them. Too many line breaks maybe?

          Your reader might not support nested quotes though.

        • Dave@lemmy.nz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          7 days ago

          That part isn’t on the original cover. Is this a real foldout from a recent MAD issue that is an updated version of the 1974 cover?

      • Theo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        7 days ago

        Yea I wondered that after I posted my comment but I wondered if it was a joke issue or something. A lot of the issues I had growing up had a front cover and a back one that would work if you flipped it the right way that was an alternative or a joke cover.

        • Dave@lemmy.nz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 days ago

          Hmm the original doesn’t have that bit in the bottom right about the original concept. Is this a real MAD foldout based on an old cover but updated for the current hot topic?