• 11 Posts
  • 834 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: June 2nd, 2023

help-circle

  • Dave@lemmy.nztome_irl@lemmy.worldme_irl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    8 days ago

    Oh I believe it’s like that here too, but I have been in the same job a couple of years now so haven’t had to face it this time around.

    I also don’t apply to roles that use (admit to using) automated screening. I will fail so there’s no point.


  • Dave@lemmy.nztome_irl@lemmy.worldme_irl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    8 days ago

    That’s where the paraphrasing and grouping comes in. If you have something sort of relevant then paraphrase the group name to make your skill fit. Sometimes I just omit things because I don’t have the skill. No one expects to get 100% of the things they list.

    If you’re looking for your first job, my advice to people is look for jobs hiring multiple people. If there’s one role you have to be the best. If there are two roles, you can be second best and still get a role.


  • Dave@lemmy.nztome_irl@lemmy.worldme_irl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    8 days ago

    I’m probably at a different point in my career. The last time I was looking for jobs, I applied for three, got three interviews, and offered two jobs (the third ended up closing without hiring anyone, which I think was the fault of their ad - it was clear to both of us in the interview I was the wrong person).

    But if I was applying for an entry level job, I probably would put the same amount of effort in.


  • Dave@lemmy.nztome_irl@lemmy.worldme_irl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    32
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    8 days ago

    I always write cover letters, but not about dreams or crap like that. I write a factual document that directly explains how I meet the requirements listed in the job ad. Literally the bullet points from the ad (with some paraphrasing or grouping) as headings. No more than a page.

    Then my CV is also cut to fit on a page, removing stuff not relevant to the job ad (and trying to avoid duplicating what’s in the cover letter).

    My cover letter I feel is more important than my CV for getting a job.


  • Yeah I can imagine trying to do it manually could get pretty tricky. I’ll look forward to the smart watch support (though I don’t own one, I might get one if others report it working well with GrapheneOS).

    Edit: also one thing to try out if possible is to remove battery optimization from Google Play Services. Your device might be killing that, which stops counting the steps.

    It seems it’s already set to not be optimized. It doesn’t seem to have access to the physical activity permission, but granting that permission didn’t seem to help. It still doesn’t count steps with the screen off.

    No matter, thanks for all the ideas, I’ll just keep watching and see if others find a solution. I’ve subscribed to the Walkscape community so hopefully you’ll be posting updates there 🙂




  • From my understanding, any app installed directly from Google Play should be in the sandbox and have access to Google Play Services. I haven’t quite worked out where the steps are missing, but it seems when the game is open it’s fine, and when the game hasn’t been killed by the OS it’s also fine. If I go back to the game and it has to launch again from scratch, it doesn’t seem to count steps that happened while the game wasn’t running (foreground or background).

    I also see this post where others are seeing the same thing, and are not using GrapheneOS. Maybe my use of GrapheneOS is a red herring and there’s actually something else happening.

    It was always odd to me that apps need to be constantly active to get the steps. I don’t get why the phone doesn’t just count in the background then allow you to request “how many steps today” or “how many steps since X date/time” via the API.





  • They have talked a bit about what they are trying to do. It’s backed by Silicon Valley billionaire Eron Wolf, and he has talked about his frustration with everyone putting their blood, sweat, and tears into the software and then someone like Facebook comes along and makes billions from the work of others.

    I get it’s frustrating, but personally I think it fails to see that Facebook is part of the ecosystem, but also so are many small companies, and many of these are contributing back to the software. If you remove the companies then you have removed a significant source of help. Eron wants to replace this with an expectation that people pay for their software, he wants to normalise paying for OSS so OSS doesn’t have to rely on the companies. You can see this in how FUTO keyboard using language implying you need to pay to get a license, but also it holds no features back from you and doesn’t nag if you don’t pay.

    Personally I welcome new ways of thinking but even if the pay for your OSS thing works I think companies are uniquely placed to contribute in ways that a small team relying on purchases is never going to be able to replicate.

    I don’t hold any ill will though, I think their heart is in the right place, albeit having missed what makes FOSS special.


  • Haha yeah I do find the licence a bit weird. Kind of a non-commercial licence but there are definitely some parts that I don’t quite get.

    I have seen Eron Wolf talking a bit about what he is trying to do. I get his frustrations, but am not convinced their licence helps with those at all. You can’t really take open source, take away some freedoms that are sometimes taken advantage of, and pretend that removing those freedoms didn’t remove the benefits that are the reason those freedoms existed in the first place.


  • Dave@lemmy.nztoTechnology@lemmy.worldGrayjay for desktop has arrived!
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    60
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    23 days ago

    Typically licenses not OSI approved are referred to as “Source available” rather than “Open source”. This is one reason FUTO (who make Grayjay) refer to their license as “Source first” and not “Open Source” (though they did call it that for a while before clarifying and switching to the new term).




  • I’m wondering if the git option is best? A public github repo is a bit more permanent, means it stays available into the future even if it stops getting maintained.

    The main issue with that is the technical hurdle for contributing, but I don’t see why people can’t comment on this post or future ones with comments if they don’t want to do a pull request.

    I prefer that over the Google docs option, and Lemmy comments are good for discussion but I think we need an “official” place to point people to. We can still discuss on Lemmy before making updates.