• exocortex@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    21 hours ago

    “Meteor” by Dan Brown (could be a different name in the original language). It was the first time I read something that was bad. Up until then book were cool and fun and interesting. It was a puzzling experience.

    Edit: it’s called “Deception Point” in the original.

  • lloydxmas@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    Anything by David Foster Wallace. Smug, preachy stream of consciousness garbage that is then annotated to oblivion by more stream of consciousness smug preachiness.

  • Muffi@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 day ago

    Revelation Space by Alastair Reynolds. I am usually a huge SciFi fan, but I like the genre for it’s ability to reflect on humanity by extrapolating on current technologies/trends or comparing our culture to unique alien ones.

    Revelation Space was technobabble and descriptions of weapons for pages upon pages, and it was totally devoid of any philosophy or reflection on humanity. I never DNF a book, but this one I almost gave up on.

  • ouRKaoS@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    2 days ago

    The Great Gatsby.

    I’ve read a lot of books, but that one I literally remember nothing about. Not a quote, not a character, not the plot… All I remember is the cover was some weird abstract art piece with creepy eyes, my brain purged everything else about it book. Probably for my own sanity.

    • OriginalUsername7@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 days ago

      The entire thing is the author wanking himself silly over his knowledge of pop culture references from his childhood. Some of it reads like it was written by a 14 year old who isn’t all that into books.

      The bit about the gaming suit that wanks the user off but also means you’re exercising so you get fit from wearing it was honestly one of the cringiest things I’ve ever read. If I thought the author was capable of the level of self reflection required, I’d have thought writing that part of the book was him acknowledging that the book is literally a work of literary masturbation.

      It should have received the same response as The Room; a bad book only made into a cult classic by the people laughing at it.

  • Dumbkid@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 day ago

    Alone with you in the ether. Both characters just bothered me with their weird ways of thinking. Could not relate to either of them

  • anarchyrabbit@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    Z for Zachariah. I read it when I was like 15 for school. Man I remeber feeling the book is like a farming manual when they tried to survive after the nuclear war. The older man trying to rape the other 16 year old girl survivor also made me super uncomfortable. Maybe it would be better if I read it now. I just remeber it being a drag.

    • Caveman@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      23 hours ago

      I listened to Atlas Shrugged as an audio book and it was ok at best. One massive criticism of communism and how it doesn’t work but suggested anarchist society as the solution. Weird rape-y sex scene in the middle also. Should have stuck with the social criticism instead of anarco capitalism utopia stuff and it’d have been good.

  • Underwaterbob@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 day ago

    I finished Battlefield Earth.

    The thing is, I remember enjoying it. I mean, it wasn’t literature, but it was a lot of dumb fun.

    • corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 day ago

      The author - whose searchable name will not appear here - was once good at writing absolute trash. And fiction too.

      Irony: when we lost everything in house fire, I’d borrowed a hard-cover copy of that famous nonfiction work, and then couldn’t return it. I paid SO much to have it replaced with a good hard-cover copy that I must be on some watchlist now.

      • blackbirdbiryani@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 day ago

        It really puts your suspension of disbelief to the test, and all the characters are terrible. I actually thought the netflix show was better than the book because the characters were alot more relatable.

        • ikidd@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          22 hours ago

          Yah, totally forgot to mention how horrendously bad the characters were. Like 50’s SF bad.

        • Random Dent@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          23 hours ago

          Yeah same here, I thought it was one of the few cases where the adaptation was better than the book. It cuts out a lot of the waffle from the books and patches up lots of holes, especially with characters like you said.

      • ikidd@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        The handwaving “science” part. And then in the end there’s this deus ex machina plot point that comes out that makes all the rest of the plot utterly pointless.

        I’ve read a lot of SF, that was the worst because I had such high hope for it after reading what everyone had to say about it. And it turned me off reading anything that’s won a Hugo entirely. That and Redshirts…