👉wiki

👉The GUARDIAN article

Pantone 448 C is a colour in the Pantone colour system. Described as a drab dark brown and informally dubbed the “ugliest colour in the world”, it was selected in 2012 as the colour for plain tobacco and cigarette packaging in Australia, after market researchers determined that it was the least attractive colour.

  • Buffaloaf@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    38
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Looks like my university’s primary color

    Edit: holy shit it is close. I looked up the RGB values, Pantone 448c is (74, 65, 42) and my university’s color is (73, 47, 36)

  • expatriado@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    1 year ago

    informally dubbed the “ugliest colour in the world”

    “informally” is doing some heavy lifting, the topic is as subjective and disputable as it gets

    • Rikudou_Sage@lemmings.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yeah, imagine all those alpha men who think colors make people gay going around with a bright pink pack of cigarettes.

      Though I’m afraid it would make it more attractive to kids.

      • Uranium3006@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        the point is to make smoking less attractive to kids to stop them from starting, current addicts aren’t really the target audiance

      • Zozano@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Well I think the horrific teeth will dissuade them lol.

        Other upside to hot pink is its very visible. If teenagers had them, teachers or police will spot it easier.

        • severien@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          14
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Wow, I had no idea it goes so high. Good for Australia, though. Cigarettes are cancer, literally.

          • youngalfred@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Well and the fact that smokers will rely more heavily on the free health system - it’s in the government’s interest to prevent people smoking to save money.

            • Rikudou_Sage@lemmings.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              That argument floats around a lot.

              At least in my country, cigarettes contribute in taxes 4 times the amount that smokers take out of free healthcare system. Note that we don’t have any “smoking-related stats”, so everything’s included - if you break a leg and you’re a smoker, it’s included in the figure.

              Also note that the numbers are few years old but I don’t think the ratio might have changed that much towards smokers contributing less, especially with the constant price increase for cigarettes.

        • Chozo@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Wow, that’s insanely high! I wonder if that hasn’t had the adverse effect of accidentally turning cigarettes into a sort of “status symbol” item in some places, as you gotta have a good chunk of expendable income to afford a habit like that.

          • Pietson@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            1 year ago

            So you’re saying the Aussies found a way to tax the rich while simultaneously shortening their lifespan?

        • SokathHisEyesOpen@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Are you serious? What in the heck? Are the tobacco lobbyists powerless? They used to run the damned world at one point not too long ago. I mean it’s great that people are abandoning cigarettes, but this is surprising.

          • Quokka@quokk.au
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            They lost like two decades ago.

            They’ve moved to mainly selling to 6 year old kids in Indonesia as they know they lost here.

            • SokathHisEyesOpen@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 year ago

              Why would parents let their 6 year old kids smoke cigarettes? There’s very little chance that toddlers are able to get cigarettes without parental assistance.

              • Quokka@quokk.au
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                1 year ago

                MANY people have seen the smoking baby on YouTube - the chubby, cheerful two-year-old from Sumatra with a pack-a-day habit. But Ardi Rizal was not a one-off curiosity. In the land of the child smoker, he is one of scores of toddlers and preschoolers addicted to nicotine.

                His parents, Iyan Ansori and mother Sulawati, are farmers from a hillside village in West Java. They know their son’s habit is unhealthy, but feel powerless to stop him. He walks down to the local warung, or cafe, to buy his own cigarettes, sometimes staying for a coffee as well. If he’s denied, ‘‘it’s like he’s possessed, he really wants it’’, says Iyan, who smokes a few cigarettes a day himself.

                https://www.smh.com.au/world/in-indonesia-big-tobacco-hasnt-got-a-worry-20120825-24tlu.html

                RESULTS We mapped 4114 cigarette retailers in Denpasar, the most common type was a kiosk, 3199 (77.8%), followed by mini market/convenience stores, 606 (14.7%). Retailer density was 32.2/km2 and 4.6/1000 population. We found that 37 (9.7 %) of the 379 schools in Denpasar have at least one cigarette retailer within a 25 m radius and 367 (96.8%) within a 250 m radius. Of the 485 audited retailers within a 250 m radius of a school, 281 (57.9%) admitted selling cigarettes to young people and 325 (67.0%) sold cigarettes as single sticks. Cigarette retailers were less likely to sell cigarettes to young people based on distance from schools, but this was only significant at the furthest distance of more than 500 m from schools.

                https://bridges.monash.edu/articles/journal_contribution/Cigarette_retailer_density_around_schools_and_neighbourhoods_in_Bali_Indonesia_A_GIS_mapping/8940548

                • SokathHisEyesOpen@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  They know their son’s habit is unhealthy, but feel powerless to stop him.

                  So they’re terrible parents. Of course he really wants it, he’s physically addicted at six years old with zero emotional maturity, or impulse control. It is their job as parents to ensure their child establishes healthy habits, and teach him how to be a human. Six year old kids don’t obtain money freely. Obviously his parents are enabling him.

    • rich@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Same in the UK. They all look like that and have done for years now

      My mate usually asks for a pack without the dead kid on it

      • SokathHisEyesOpen@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        They put a picture of a dead kid on a pack of cigarettes? Why? Cigarettes kill you very slowly, long after childhood. Just for the ugliness? That seems a step too far if it’s completely unrelated to the risks of smoking.

        • rich@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          1 year ago

          You simply do not get it.

          Shocking images like that put off new smokers and young adults, especially of the new generation who are very health and image conscious. It is working.

        • wisplike_sustainer@suppo.fi
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 year ago

          Smoking during pregnancy increases the risk of preterm birth, and child mortality soon after birth. Second hand smoke isn’t healthy for babies, either. It increases the risk of sudden infant death syndrome, among other, slower and probably more painful ways of dying.

        • Rikudou_Sage@lemmings.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          The pictures are not very accurate. And from the times I was a smoker, I remember everyone just making fun of them.