The 14th Amendment to the Constitution bans anyone who “engaged in insurrection or rebellion against” the U.S. from holding office.

A Florida lawyer is suing Donald Trump in an attempt to disqualify his current run for president. Lawrence A. Caplan’s Thursday lawsuit claims that the ex-president’s involvement in the Jan. 6 Capitol riot would make him ineligible to run again, thanks to the Constitution’s 14th Amendment—a Civil War-era addition aimed at preventing those who “engaged in insurrection or rebellion against” the U.S. from holding office. “Now given that the facts seem to be crystal clear that Trump was involved to some extent in the insurrection that took place on January 6th, the sole remaining question is whether American jurists who swear an oath to uphold the U.S. Constitution upon their entry to the bench, will choose to follow the letter of the Constitution in this case,” the lawsuit says, also citing Trump’s alleged efforts to overturn the 2020 election results in Georgia. Legal experts say it’s an uphill battle to argue in court, since the amendment has hardly been exercised in modern history. “Realistically, it’s not a Hail Mary, but it’s just tossing the ball up and hoping it lands in the right place,” Charles Zelden, a professor of history and legal studies at Nova Southeastern University, told the South Florida Sun Sentinel.

archive link to South Florida Sun Sentinel article: https://archive.ph/1BntD

  • tim-clark@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    1 year ago

    That case is also an example of this working. The case in front of the Supreme Court had no standing since is was fake plaintiffs.

    • Neuromancer@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      That was a different case. That was about a web developer not wanting to do gay marriage websites or some crap. The plaintiff was fake but the courts still ruled on it which I found confusing.

      • afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        The Supreme Court doesn’t think separation of church and state is worth preserving and will do every it can to dismantle it. That is why we are getting state funded religious schools and prayer is creeping back in.

        • Neuromancer@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          11
          ·
          1 year ago

          I am an atheist and I don’t mind state funding private schools through vouchers. I can’t speak for all religious schools but when I was growing up, those were the most highly rated schools. We need to fix our schools and competition is a good thing. The other option is we ban all private schools. I can’t remember which country did that and they had good results but they do find religious schools the same.