• cmbabul@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    9 months ago

    I swear to god how are all these tech billionaires that grew up as nerds not seeing what they are doing

    • Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      9 months ago

      Agree these aren’t the people I want doing this, but are you saying we should tuck heads in sand and just not build robots?

      • Yawweee877h444@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        Agree with your comment. It seems most people are conservative about stuff like this due to fear.

        I personally want the AI and the cool robot stuff, without hesitation. Our problem (imo) is our current corrupt, exploitative capitalist system. We need regulation that protects the entire populace, not just the billionaire and corporate leadership class. All these advancements should absolutely be explored, but for the benefit of all, and protections for everyone.

        How we fix this though, I’m cynical. Which is why I respect people who are mostly afraid of the possible negative consequences.

      • coolmojo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        9 months ago

        I want Rosie the robot from the Jetsons, who vacuums and does the ironing. Instead we will probably get the RoboCop and the Terminator.

        • bobs_monkey@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          I’m sensing that were more likely to see robot cops (like from Elysium) than we are to see Rosie

            • bobs_monkey@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              9 months ago

              I’d imagine they’d be all objective and not emotional, just depends on their programming and who programs them

      • cmbabul@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        9 months ago

        No, but there definitely should be a billion safeguards on it, and they should in no way be under the direct control of those already in positions of power

        • Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          Hard to build that many safeguards on something so new, safeguards need to develop with it. We’ve got asimov etc of course but thats not “billions”

    • just_another_person@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      9 months ago

      They know exactly what they are doing. They are all desperate to be in charge of our new AI powered overlords.

      AI doesn’t benefit anyone on this planet whatsoever except wealthy people at the end of the day. It only serves to oppress the majority of the populace otherwise, one way or another.

      • cmbabul@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        9 months ago

        The way it currently exists 100%, if the goal for using AI wasn’t profit above all it could be extremely useful for common humans. It probably never will be that but it could potentially be

      • MxM111@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        9 months ago

        That’s totally unfounded statement. As in no proof of any statement whatsoever. I am sure luddites were saying similar things.

        • just_another_person@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          9 months ago

          It’s basic economics, actually. The same way any other automation only serves to reduce human workforce and increase profits. You think factory automation serves to benefit the general masses somehow? What do you think all these robots are going be doing? Wandering around and helping the general public isn’t profitable for the long list of wealthy individuals trying to make them a reality 🤣

          • conciselyverbose@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            9 months ago

            You wouldn’t have the computer you’re complaining from without hundreds of years of automation and tools making labor more efficient to make it happen.

            Or, with the number of people on the planet, even 1% of the food it takes for you to not die.

            • just_another_person@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              9 months ago

              With humans having created these tools. Now the goal is to automate the humans away as much as possible. Complete shift from the past examples and experiences you’ve mentioned.