Collision Resistance@lemmy.world to politics @lemmy.worldEnglish · 9 months agoJoe Biden’s chances do not look good. The Democrats have no plan Bwww.economist.comexternal-linkmessage-square17fedilinkarrow-up117arrow-down168file-textcross-posted to: politics@lemmy.world
arrow-up1-51arrow-down1external-linkJoe Biden’s chances do not look good. The Democrats have no plan Bwww.economist.comCollision Resistance@lemmy.world to politics @lemmy.worldEnglish · 9 months agomessage-square17fedilinkfile-textcross-posted to: politics@lemmy.world
Archived link : https://archive.is/20240104112059/https://www.economist.com/briefing/2024/01/04/joe-bidens-chances-do-not-look-good-the-democrats-have-no-plan-b
minus-squaretsonfeir@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up6arrow-down8·9 months agolol. Say whom? Seriously… the article doesn’t even have an author name. Just another round of right-wing propaganda.
minus-squaresunbrrnslapper@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up7arrow-down1·9 months agoNo article at the Economist has an author to keep the focus on the information, not the reporter. Overall it is a good news source.
minus-squareGodlessCommie@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3arrow-down3·9 months agoChecking for the author before deciding the validity of the contents is the result of propaganda
minus-squaretsonfeir@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down4·9 months agoI guess that means it’s propaganda
lol. Say whom? Seriously… the article doesn’t even have an author name.
Just another round of right-wing propaganda.
No article at the Economist has an author to keep the focus on the information, not the reporter. Overall it is a good news source.
Sounds pretty sketchy.
Checking for the author before deciding the validity of the contents is the result of propaganda
I guess that means it’s propaganda