• Tremble@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    61
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    1 year ago

    Great; so this is all public domain knowledge since it was created with AI according to current law, right?

        • datendefekt@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          1 year ago

          All utilities, phone, electricity, sewage, road and rail.

          But actually looking at these, pretty much all protocols and standards are already open.

          • TheMurphy@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            14
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            No, because paying for your medicin and Internet is something your government/country SHOULD do.

            Healthy people with access to the surrounding world through the Internet is a giant net positive for a country.

            But ofc we have to think of the poor billionaires first.

            • Fredthefishlord@lemmy.blahaj.zone
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Healthy people with access to the surrounding world through the Internet is a giant net positive for a country

              Certainly, if that was all the public domain was, it’d be great! But it’s much worse than that. It allows people to freely take and profit off the art of others without paying dividends. It allows larger companies to steal and copy designs of small, new companies and under cut them even more readily and easily than they already do.

              There’s plenty of downsides that you’re not considering.

              • TheMurphy@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                I don’t know if you commented on the wrong thing, but I argued that medicin and Internet (and similar) should be paid by the country (taxes).

          • deft@ttrpg.network
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            lol “innovation” what is this 1925?

            how innovative are the cars being produced because they look the same.

            half those medicines are publicly funded

            the Internet is publicly funded.

            this belief of private sector innovation is not as true as they sell it to be.

            • Tremble@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              7
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              This. Public institutions do a way better job and are more efficient at most things compared to private companies. It’s just a fact.

              • deft@ttrpg.network
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                Private just makes more money and also you can do ridiculous shit like blow up your own rocket, destroying a landing pad in the process and ignore environmental and labor laws.

            • Fredthefishlord@lemmy.blahaj.zone
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              So you’re just going to ignore the even worse creative theft that would happen under such laws towards artistic talents.

              There’d be much less in the way of tv shows or animations.

    • guitarsarereal@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      37
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yeah, so the actual law is that if you didn’t do any work and just gave ChatGPT or Midjourney a prompt and it shat out a picture and then brag to the copyright office in your application that you didn’t do diddly squat, the work effectively had no human authors. If, instead, you build a new machine learning model, tune it for your specific problem, analyze the results, and furthermore, break new ground understanding how it solved your problem, and then you write the paper, in fact, you have tons of ownership over the work.

      The fact people can’t tell the difference between the two and are actually upvoting you kind of says a lot about how little most people understand this stuff.

  • Vector@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    ·
    1 year ago

    A key innovation of the new study is that the researchers were also able to figure out what kinds of information the deep-learning model was using to make its antibiotic potency predictions. This knowledge could help researchers to design additional drugs that might work even better than the ones identified by the model.

    That is awesome. I wonder if the techniques that they have used to expose the machine learning “black box” process can be applied to other models - from my understanding of it, that would be pretty big news in and of itself.

  • Fades@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    1 year ago

    With the defeat of the super bugs, I for one welcome the super super bugs.

  • Maggoty@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Great. Now lock it away and require CDC approval for each dose. We may just get out of this alive.

    Just kidding, nobody gets out of life alive.