• BetaDoggo_@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    196
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Dropping support after only 25 years? I can’t believe Linux is contributing to planned obsolescence.

  • redcalcium@lemmy.institute
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    113
    ·
    1 year ago

    ATI Rage 128, 3Dfx, S3 Savage, Intel 810, SiS, VIA and Matrox MGA DRM drivers

    Those are some ancient cards! Can’t believe they’re supported this long.

    • addie@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      51
      ·
      1 year ago

      I still have a Rage 128 hanging around as a ‘temporary head’ for installing headless servers. Many happy nights playing Thief: The Dark Project with it, and now it’s only good for rendering a TTY at a barely acceptable resolution. And soon, not even that. Goodbye, little e-waste :-(

    • KISSmyOS@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      1 year ago

      That brings me back to my first PC build, 20 years ago, using parts my friends had discarded cause they were too old.

  • bruhduh@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    56
    ·
    1 year ago

    For all worrying about it I’d like to say, you can re-add driver code and compile your own kernel, and everything will be working fine, and last time I’ve read wiki there’s SLTC support for Linux 6.1 means your GPUs will be officially supported until 2033

    • waigl@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      66
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      AMD and nVidia on Windows: So your GPU is still very capable and useful for almost everything including most gaming tasks, but it’s a couple years old and not making us money any more? Sucks to be you, have fun hunting for unmaintained legacy drivers with likely security holes from questionable sources.

      Linux: Your video card is from a long bygone era of computing, before the term “GPU” was a thing, and basically a museum piece by now? We’ll maintain a long-term support version for you for the next ten years.

      • EmbeddedEntropy@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I must be ancient then. I recognized, and I think used, all of those cards/chips.

        Some personally. Some at work. At work I used to maintain and MS-DOS / early Windows graphics program. I had to test the program’s compatibility with a stack of graphics cards.

      • aard@kyu.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’m still angry at nvidia for buying their remains, and not doing anything useful with it.

        3dfx had multi GPU support back then, it took quite a while afterwards until somebody else tried that.

    • aard@kyu.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’ve been using (or, in some cases, trying to use) that when it was brand new. Kernel side was relatively easy - but there was a lot of compiling custom versions of XFree86 trying to get acceleration working properly.

      On the one hand a bit sad to see that kind of history I’ve experienced myself go - on the other hand, it’s probably been a decade since I’ve last used something without KMS, and the ease of use of modern KMS drivers is way ahead of all the older stuff.

    • damium@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’ve had a system in the late 90s with a 3dfx voodoo card. Also had a laptop with a SIS card from the early 2000 era.

      The voodoo card was THE card to have it it’s day (mine was an older second hand system though). The SIS card… for some reason they decided that standard VESA mode probing wasn’t a thing they supported and would hardware crash when that API was used. I eventually got it working in Linux after patching xfree86 to not attempt probing when loading the VESA driver.

        • damium@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I think I remember running into that as well but for whatever reason I couldn’t get accelerated-x working with the opengl libraries I was using for school. Likely the issue was just a lack of understanding on my part as I don’t think I had a good grasp of the Linux library loader until well after I graduated.

  • ToriborA
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    38
    ·
    1 year ago

    3DFX

    There is a name I haven’t heard in a long time.

  • AutoTL;DR@lemmings.worldB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    1 year ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    The ATI Rage 128, 3Dfx, S3 Savage, Intel 810, SiS, VIA and Matrox MGA DRM drivers were what was phased out in Linux 6.3.

    Thomas Zimmermann of SUSE is now aiming to take things one step further by removing the infrastructure for user-space mode-setting.

    Zimmermann wrote on dri-devel: The old drivers for user-space mode setting have been removed in Linux v6.3.

    The recent Linux v6.6 has been designated as long-term release, so any remaining users have a few more years to get a new graphics card.

    These 14 patches get rid of another 8k lines of legacy code within the Direct Rendering Manager subsystem.

    If no objections are raised, this legacy user-space mode-setting infrastructure removal could happen for the Linux 6.8 kernel cycle in the new year.


    The original article contains 340 words, the summary contains 127 words. Saved 63%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!

  • db2@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    34
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    so any remaining users have a few more years to get a new graphics card.

    Anyone running a Voodoo is doing so because they want to. Dropping support is bullshit.

    • bruhduh@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      1 year ago

      Driver code is still there, you can add it back if you want, same with ide drivers and such, support was removed but code still exists, just add it and compile your own kernel, there are alot of tutorials in internet about it

    • fornax@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      1 year ago

      The drivers were removed in 6.3. Debian 12 is still running on 6.1. Debian 12 just came out and still has many years of support ahead of it (at least 5). You can get plenty of use out of these cards before they stop working.

        • rasensprenger@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          21
          ·
          1 year ago

          Someone needs to maintain them for them to keep working. Nobody else is willing to do that anymore, but you can still volunteer as a maintainer. If you don’t, it’s as much your fault as anyone elses.

          • db2@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            10
            ·
            1 year ago

            There’s a big difference between dropping a driver and dropping the ability to have the driver. I’ve compiled plenty of drivers.

        • bouh@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          12
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I would suppose anyone running a computer with these relics can recompile a kernel to get these drivers back

    • Nougat@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      1 year ago

      Voodoo cards are worth money to the right people. They’re used in a bunch of coin-op arcade games.

        • jackpot@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          16
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          why on earth do arcade machines need kernel updates? the feds gonna hack into the highscores lmfao

          • snaptastic@beehaw.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            19
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Seems like you’re annoyed that I pointed out that what you were saying was irrelevant? And so you reply with more irrelevant crap (on a very nerdy, not-fun-at-parties internet forum for Linux discussion)? Let me know if I got that wrong.

            • Nougat@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              6
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Somebody mentioned Voodoo cards, I had a bit of information that related to that. That’s how discussions work; they kind of go where they go.

              But I’ll make absolutely sure to get your permission before I comment again.

  • Avid Amoeba@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    36
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    So much for the legendary hardware support of Linux!

    Edit: Forgot “/s”, but look at this lively discussion!

      • db2@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        9
        ·
        1 year ago

        You know there’s a whole hobby of keeping older hardware running, right?

            • patatahooligan@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              14
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Linux 6.1 will be maintained for another 10 years by the CIP. The hardware in question will be almost 40 years old at that point. I don’t have a violin small enough for users losing free support after 40 years from maintainers who most likely don’t even own the same hardware to test on…

              • interdimensionalmeme@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                5
                ·
                1 year ago

                On the other hand, they were probably unchanged for decades. Did anything really change, or is this just a case of we need to remove 500k lines of code, what is most useless ? Let’s cut that.

                In other words, removed because it’s a KPI to remove lines, and this makes number go up.

                • patatahooligan@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  6
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Keeping code around isn’t free. Interfaces change, regressions pop up. You have to occasionally put in work just to keep it in a working state. Usually in cases like this there are discussions on the mailing list about who is going to maintain them and nobody volunteers. You can do that if you’re so passionate about keeping these drivers around.

                • saigot@lemmy.ca
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  So if it’s been unchanged for decades then you can just add it yourself and recompile the kernel. Elsewhere you argue that you can’t just add old drivers to a newer kernel, which implies these drivers require some nontrivial amount of maintaince. Which is it.

        • demonsword@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          I doubt any hardware 25+ years can even run a modern vanilla linux kernel, you’d have to compile it yourself with some serious customization for it even work