I actually fact checked this and it’s true.

  • Gladaed@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    1 year ago

    Just because they didn’t change their appearance doesnt mean they did not evolve. It is somewhat misleading to say that, but conveys a point I guess.

    • DragonTypeWyvern@literature.cafe
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      1 year ago

      More relevantly, the fossil records for sharks are mostly their teeth and jaws, because all their other bones are cartilage and rarely fossilize.

      “Sharks haven’t significantly evolved in appearance in 350 million years” is therefore based on reconstructions made under the assumption that the old sharks mostly looked like current sharks, which may or may not be true.

      Though we can get a surprising amount of information that way, for example one change is that their jaws used be more at the end of their snout instead of more underslung like today, like so:

      https://www.smithsonianmag.com/science-nature/new-technologies-reveal-strange-jaws-prehistoric-sharks-180977396

      You’ll note the Goblin Shark still has hints of that design.

    • miss_brainfart@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 year ago

      I made sure to say barely instead of not at all, but you’re right, there was certainly some evolution happening