• raptir@lemdro.id
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    1 year ago

    with an overall average score of 66. It’s ranked in the bottom 30% of games

    That doesn’t sit right with me.

    • cdipierr@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yeah, it’s kind of messed up that I read a 66 as a stunningly negative response.

      “Gave me a terminal disease.” - 6/10

        • Wumbologist@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          That’s how I view it too. 60-70 is bad. 70-80 is average. 80-90 is good. 90-100 is great.

          Under 60 is just varying degrees of terrible.

    • ToriborA
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 year ago

      Games basically start at a 4/10 if they at least launch and are playable.

    • fibojoly@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Think of it this way : should games that people pay money for be below average, ie, failures?

      Anything below 60% shouldn’t even see the light of day, really. Seen like this, it seems a lot more reasonable to me that 30% of released games would be below 70%. In fact, I’d say it’s still way too many games that probably should still be in the oven.