• OBJECTION!@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    4 hours ago

    I won’t defend all of the USSR’s actions, but it’s absurd to suggest they were motivated by any sort of ideological alignment with the Nazis as opposed to self-interest and circumstance, in the same way that the US and USSR were motivated by a common interest rather than ideological alignment.

    At basically every other moment in history, all across the globe, Marxists and fascists have been at each other’s throats.

    Nothing I’ve said is in the least bit “historical revisionism.”

    • Zloubida@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Still, the USSR considered that an alliance with Nazi Germany was ideologically acceptable, even if they were not aligned. Because the only true ideology of USSR was to maintain its leaders in power, Marxism was just a facade. And that’s will always ultimately the case with authoritarian governments.

      • OBJECTION!@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 hours ago

        Of course self-preservation was a priority for the USSR, as it is with any nation. Failure to achieve self-preservation would have meant being ruled by the Nazis.

        Not sure how that in any way indicates that “Marxism was a facade.”

        • Zloubida@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          3 hours ago

          Self-preservation is something else than making an offensive alliance with Nazis.