• sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      Yeah, took me a couple tries. I thought mods were stopping “fuel extremism,” so like maybe people were talking about intentionally wasting gas or something, and mods were telling users to cut it out.

      I got there, but it was a bit of word-salad at first.

    • thelittleblackbird@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      Most of those moderation just step in the moment the lie enters the chat.

      And no, you freedom of speech does not allow you to lie without facing the consecuences

    • Isoprenoid@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      1 day ago

      Both sides, because both have extremist ideologies.

      Freedom of speech is a government thing, this article is about organisations. It doesn’t apply.

      • Isoprenoid@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        Nah, downvoted because it doesn’t spark healthy discussion.

        “What about freedom of speech?” isn’t a valid question because the article is about social media, not a government. There are no freedom of speech rights on social media platforms.

        • LordKitsuna@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          You expect Americans to actually understand anything about their own bill of rights? Seems unreasonable given how uneducated they are