• kameecoding@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    48
    ·
    edit-2
    7 days ago

    It’s not false equivalence, it’s negation of your logic, but different.

    I might have put down, some people want to get drunk and beat you up, and the police is in the way of that too, now unless you are into that you provably don’t want to get beaten up by drunks.

    The crime doesn’t matter, I choose extreme example to get the point across that your reasoning as to why ACAB is flawed and meaningless point farming.

    • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      37
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      7 days ago

      It’s not false equivalence

      It very much is. You’re equivocating alcohol and child abuse.

      it’s negation of your logic

      Nope. Just because cops arrest child abusers doesn’t mean that they’re the only answer. In fact, a well-funded social safety net is much better at discovering and stopping it and most if not all other societal, psychological and psychiatric problems than cops will ever be.

      but different.

      Well, at least you got that part right 🤷

      I might have put down, some people want to get drunk and beat you up, and the police is in the way of that too, now unless you are into that you provably don’t want to get beaten up by drunks

      Another case of giving cops credit for something that they do by default even though their way of dealing with it is much WORSE than alternative ways less focused on use of force and punishment as a deterrent.

      The crime doesn’t matter

      It very much does, as treating every societal problem with the same blunt tool is an awful idea

      get the point across that your reasoning as to why ACAB is flawed

      Overly simplified for the sake of brevity, maybe, but otherwise nope, wrong again.

      meaningless point farming

      This might be difficult to understand to someone whose opinions are unpopular because they’re bad, but sometimes people express honest opinions that other people agree with, rather than playing pretend for points.

        • LaLuzDelSol@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          7 days ago

          Haha welcome to Lemmy m8. I’ve gotten into this exact argument before. I’m all for police reform and I was out there in the George Floyd protests but the hatred of police officers on this platform is absolutely rabid.

          Imo, the argument that ACAB because the good ones don’t stop the bad ones can be applied to virtually any group of people. So we’re all bastards I guess.

          • Masterbaexunn@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            7 days ago

            No it can’t be applied evenly. Cops have legal authority to use force, including lethal force. Name another group of people with that right.

            • LaLuzDelSol@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              7 days ago

              Soldiers.

              But anyways, i think it’s just as reprehensible for, as an example, an engineer to not report his coworker cutting corners on an infrastructure project that could jeopardize an entire community (maybe he wanted to meet a deadline to make himself look good, maybe he took money under the table from an interested party) as for a cop to not report his coworker who took a bribe from a drug dealer. In both cases, the bystander has equal ability to intervene and potentially save lives. The fact that the police officer has the right to use force as part of their job description isn’t really relevant.

              • Masterbaexunn@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                6 days ago

                What? No, according to international law and the Geneva Conventions, soldiers generally do not have the legal authority to kill a citizen unless that citizen is actively participating in hostilities during a declared war, meaning they are considered a combatant; killing a civilian who is not actively involved in combat would be considered a war crime

                • LaLuzDelSol@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  6 days ago

                  You didn’t say anything about civilians. And besides, police officers can only use lethal force in either self defense or to protect others. In fact, that’s the same standard for “lawful homicide” as literally anyone else.

        • Masterbaexunn@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          14
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          7 days ago

          The “good” cops stand up for the same system that shelters, protects, and encourages the bad cops. There’s no nuance. It is what it is. Therefore ACAB.

          • frezik@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            7 days ago

            Right, the nuance is that there are bad cops and worse cops. It’s not a system that’s capable of change from the inside, and will actively fight anyone who tries until they give up, get shuttled away to a place that doesn’t matter with no hope of promotion, or even end up dead.

              • LaLuzDelSol@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                7 days ago

                There is nothing inherently immoral about being a police officer though (as opposed to being a Nazi). Everyone but anarchists understands the need for police officers/“Violence of the state” in some capacity.

                  • LaLuzDelSol@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    6 days ago

                    Replace cops with “doctors” or “engineers” or literally anything- why do people only make this argument with cops?

              • postmateDumbass@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                6 days ago

                If your society is regulated by Nazis, i blame the entire country and all its citizens.

                the collective would have embraced facism and murderous eugenics as guiding principles.

                So it is the fault of the citizens, because they created, nurtured, and tolerated an environment to sustain the Nazis.

                So all citizens are bad.

                • UrPartnerInCrime@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  6 days ago

                  I mean yeah people who usually back the blue are usually pieces of shit.

                  And I say this as someone who’s mother was a police officer.

            • Masterbaexunn@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              7 days ago

              A pig with lipstick is still a fuckin pig

              Edit: and honestly, they get a metric fuckton of help from non-profits and the like. Stop romanticizing law enforcement

            • null@slrpnk.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              7 days ago

              Do you genuinely think anyone is claiming bad entities never do good things?

          • kameecoding@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            edit-2
            7 days ago

            So when I pull on a gun on you and take your money, your car, you will definitely not call those goddamn bastards, right? You swear?

            • chemicalprophet@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              7 days ago

              Always one of these cucks projecting their cowardice. Don’t worry I won’t punk you for your shit today little man…

                • VirtualOdour@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  6 days ago

                  You’re not talking to serious people, their anticop mentality stems from.sensoble thoughts like "corrupt cops are bad’ and ‘the system is often unfair’ but spirals into a dogmatic hero fantasy where they get to kill people they dislike and win every gunfight just like the movies of the old west.

                  Of course those stories of noble outlaws doing right by the people are fantasy and the reality is a mass of cruelty, rape, theft, murder and violence. They have this idea that they’ll be the tough guy with a gun who can live life however they please because they don’t have compassion for other humans, not the old, sick, weak, and certainly not women, children, or those the work hard to live a good life.

                  They think that you’re weak for wanting an official body who’s job it is to enforce the rules of society because they love to imagine themselves as an untouchable hero that doesn’t need rules, also they love the idea of people needing them for safety - a woman being able to live somewhat safely through a system of laws and justice upsets them because they’d love to be the strong man with a gun that women have to keep happy and near if they want protection.

                  Every anarchist autonomous no cops zone instantly gets a gang that act like cops without any of the hard fought and long studied protections for the people - and bigger areas where law governments collapse get lots of these gangs who all fight each other… thousands of years of shitty history lead to the development of established and regulated police forces - yes they’re far from perfect but we need to work on improving them, adding oversight and better training, new systems and organizational structures.

            • HelixDab2@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              7 days ago

              Why would I call the cops? To report that I killed someone that tried to rob me? Naw man, I know plenty of places to dump a body where it’s not gonna be found for years, if ever. Welcome to Appalachia.

              Oh, you think that people that think ACAB aren’t armed…?