Easy Anti Cheat - requires manual removal

Wait, so this sketchy, privacy-invading stuff remains even after a game is uninstalled?! I had no idea.

How is this stuff not classed as malware at this point?

You’ll want to download and install the most up-to-date drivers. I believe this model benefits from a slight overclock too, so maybe look at purchasing a decent aftermarket cooler

What a shame. He was a good man

This is dangerous

Well, they say you do have to be over 18 to use Concepts

C++: Nuh, uh …

template <typename T>
concept Crackable = requires(T obj) {
    { obj.crack() };
};

auto crack(Crackable auto& nut) {
    nut.crack();
}

Has “laying off staff to focus on AI “ become a common euphemism for “we hired too many people”?

If you’re using Steam then you could try adding PROTON_LOG=1 %command% to your launch options for the game. This will output a log file into $HOME/steam-$APPID.log ($APPID will probably be 823130 in this case). This log file might show why the game isn’t starting. You could even post this log file here as a pastebin link to see if anyone can help diagnose if you’re unable to see anything obvious.

Are you personally working on NVK? Terrific work if you are BTW! This is really positive progress

Yeah, that’s understandable; there’s probably a lot a proprietary stuff in the cuda sdk / driver.

If/when NVK becomes the defacto driver for nv GPUs, what would it mean for cuda?

<3

I absolutely plan to support team red/blue GPUs. I just don’t have access to the h/w right now

The pfp is goofy af. It stays 😂

Just by “eyeballing” the two, there’s very little, if any difference on my setup.

Haha. There’s no Wayland support… yet. Check out gpu-screen-recorder for a very similar project with Wayland support

Thank you for your kind words!

I haven’t made the jump to Wayland yet. I basically live in the terminal (when I’m not playing games!) so haven’t been in any rush. I definitely want to support Wayland going forward because it seems everyone has switched but me!

I’d be surprised if it doesn’t do something similar. I haven’t used OBS so I can’t really comment to it’s performance

That means cryptographic keys under one government’s control could be used to intercept HTTPS communication

Could someone smarter than me explain how this would be possible? Wouldn’t the browser still be able to enforce privacy between the client and origin? Or is it the case that certificates issued by these CAs could in theory only support weaker cyphers?

Edit: Some really useful explanations. Thank you!

Does this compile with -Wall -Werror? (might not be an option if your dependencies’ headers contain warnings)

Looks like it may be embedded code for a SoC or similar. The only things I can think of is that the tool chain you’re using maybe non-standard… or you’re invoking the dreaded Undefined Behaviour somewhere :(

Clang won’t tell you if you’re missing a return statement.

Is this C++? Have you got some code examples?

I’ve been writing C++ for 20+ years and the last compiler I encountered this with was Borland’s. In the late 90s.