That’s not true. You don’t have to ask someone to stop committing defamation before suing them for defamation.
That’s not true. You don’t have to ask someone to stop committing defamation before suing them for defamation.
Does it count as a tell when it’s irrelevant? Everything Trump says is a lie. You can tell he’s lying because his lips are moving. The addition of the word “Sir” doesn’t change anything.
The government can ban tobacco, but it’s undeniably tyrannical to ban a drug because you don’t like the consequences people are choosing for themselves.
Gerrymandering is legal, as is mentioned in the article. What’s not legal is racial gerrymandering. If all a court does is find a map to be gerrymandered, it won’t send it to anyone to be redrawn.
Banning specific guns is pure theater, even if it passes. There’s zero real safety in it.
You’re agreeing with the rich people in this case when you say that. They got none of those things in this case. They’re being taxed on money they could theoretically get.
deleted by creator
Lemmings in several subs, this one included, seem to reliably comment on content they haven’t actually read. It’s bizarre.
It is making mistakes, not lying. To lie it must believe it is telling falsehoods, and it is not capable of belief.
Communism is a hell of a drug.
Not an amendment.
What amendment is that? Because the 16A doesn’t say that - and neither does the core document, which is why we needed the 16A.
Do you have experience in Arizona, specifically? These allegations about weaponizing CPS to go after poor people for being poor are state-specific.
Well, the poster is mostly linguistic prescriptivism (defining what words mean). That small caveat at the bottom that words can mean whatever you want them to can’t really defeat the entire rest of the poster.
Names are meaningless. The allies were fighting the “National Socialists”, who weren’t Socialists. Likewise, “Defund the Police” movement members need not actually support defunding the police - supporting lowering their funding without lowering it to zero still qualifies.
I’m deeply unfamiliar with Arkenfox, but does it really supercede NoScript? One of my primary uses for NoScript is bypassing soft paywalls.
It’s not about being correct, it’s about how the mathematics of voting works. American Presidential elections are fundamentally designed to force you into a binary choice. This is fixable ans so of course Congress refuses to fix it, but the problem is real, not a delusion.
“Libertarian conservative” makes exactly as much sense as “authoritarian liberal” and has the same energy as “lawful chaotic” or “evil good”.
So far it seems like Reddit but with a lot less content. I’m assuming that’s primarily a popularity problem.
I’ve never seen “dufus” spelled that way before, it’s immediately enticing.- like you hybridized the word with “Rufus”.