You mean other than “it’s content” in the title?
You mean other than “it’s content” in the title?
That must be really frustrating.
Don’t they complain about hypochondriacs?
If I hadn’t heard about Andre Agassi’s autobiography I’d read this tweet as a joke, but now I’m not sure any more.
Idiot language pedant? I mean, the difference between it’s/its is just a matter of basic grammar. We’re not talking here about some obscure feature of the English language. And to be honest, the “fuck off” part was kind of off-key, if you ask me.
None of us here have invented the rules of the English language (or, for that matter, any other language). But once these rules are given, let’s try to use them as best as we can.
I refuse to believe that distinguishing between “its” and “it’s” is complicated (you just need to know that “it’s” is a contraction of “it is”). Rather, I believe that most people simply don’t want to take their 0.01 seconds to think of the correct case: “I’ll be understood just the same.”
Or in other words: I’m sure that if you gave a prize of, say, $100 to a group of people for correctly placing “its/it’s” in a hundred sentences, more than 90% would do it correctly in all of them.
From my point of view, the number of times “its/it’s” is written incorrectly does not measure how difficult the English language is but rather the number of people who bother to try to write it correctly.
I wonder how much of a brain is needed to tell it’s from its.
A friend of mine told me a long time ago: “if a windows system is behaving funny, it has to do with virus. If a Linux system is behaving funny, it has to do with permissions”
Most probably outcome from her face; disappointment.
But one unch of material doesn’t dilate as much as one foot of the same material. I guess that’s what they mean when asking “per inch per foot?”
Not sure if it’s brilliant for its convenience, or just should be illegal since it just provides a “flying” object with would be so easy to stumble on.
Don’t waste your time. They’ll be able to provide any kind of “reasons”.
ncdu