Someone should invent a game, that while playing demonstrates how much monopolies suck for everyone involved (except the monopolist)
Someone should invent a game, that while playing demonstrates how much monopolies suck for everyone involved (except the monopolist)
That’s a short but touching poem.
“Made unusable”: that’s not how it works. Even with occasional vandalism, there’s so much more people positively contributing, that overall the map just keeps on getting better and better.
IIRC, this actually happens. When the balance is disturbed, the mushrooms go wild and destroy young sapplings. Could be I recall incorrectly and it’s actually other species. I cannot recommend The Mother Tree enough, it goes into great detail of the history of research into this
Their system automatically makes a winner of the biggest party. In any country that uses that system, it automatically leads to two main parties alternating in power. The advantage is that you don’t need “messy” and “unstable” coalitions, but can have strong leadership with a solid base instead. Except that perhaps string leadership is a dangerous thing to have in many cases, and except that if the balance tends towards 50/50, you can easily have problems getting anything done.
It is a non issue. It is also not unlikely for Trump to go completely nuclear over this, hopefully showing a few more folks what a moron he is.
And we are still increasing the rate at which we are making it worse…
It’s a laughing stock here in Belgium
The impact of beef is still gigantic compared to other food sources, even if it’s local or grass fed.
Funny thing is that congestion is basically queuing for mobility services. And queuing is exactly what you get in communist systems where the state provides for you. So highways are socialism!
Women are not even more dangerous than that they have to be