Or just use a distro that sets everything up for you.
Seems like anything is the solution except that in your mind, lol.
Glad we have option 😎
Or just use a distro that sets everything up for you.
Seems like anything is the solution except that in your mind, lol.
Glad we have option 😎
Thought Arch was all about DIY?
None, but bugs stick around way longer in debian stable because of how old the software is.
Did you… really think I was talking about a bugless distro?
Problem with debian is it’s stable in the sense of unchanging, not necessarily a lack of bugs.
He’s saying he wants up to date packages and stability, which seems to mean he was current software without bugs. That’s not debian stable.
Bro. It’s a public forum. What ‘digital privacy’ are you talking about?
No they aren’t. Users literally do not have the power to choose which instances they see. They have to rely on their instance admins or make their own instance.
Yay censorship and users not being able to make decisions for themselves!
Yay emotions!
Dang, that’s lame. I guess it’s up to users to adapt LO to their distro.
Your point was that users can use arch install scripts to automate some of the setup process.
I countered by saying they could just use a distro that has an installer integrated directly into it.
I also added that in your mind, there is no legitimate reason to use an arch derivative. This highlights your bias.
What was I missing, exactly?