Despite this person in the photo saying a vote for Democrats is a vote for democracy the Democrats have zero interest in changing the current situation.
They have a good thing going for them.
When their opponent is literally fascism they don’t have to deliver anything to the people and can shame voters for being sick of it all and going third party
It is an abusive relationship
At least you’re honest about your ignorance
Most redditors will say that democrats are better than republicans, but that does not make someone a leftist. Democrats in America are center right at best and ripe with a ton of corruption of their own. Noticing that both parties are evil and we need economic reform beyond what either of them offer is the entrypoint to crossing the centerline
Multi account containers is the reason I use Firefox over ungoogled chromium
The devastating fires in Maui, a tragedy long forewarned, are a stark reminder of the failure to prioritize human well-being over short-term cost considerations. My heart aches for the lives lost and the homes destroyed; this catastrophe underscores the systemic failure to heed warnings and underscores the urgent need for a compassionate, foresighted approach to our shared environment and community.
My experience has been the opposite. I’ve found that the majority of users tend to lean towards neoliberal and center-right ideologies. I guess most of them are probably American, so their warped worldview has them considering these ideologies as ‘left-wing’ instead 🙃
Currently using signal but have been intrigued by some of the no phone number alternatives like SimpleX
If I’m going to have a crook in office, I’d rather they be a crook that awakens people to the issues that matter such as medicare for all and ending the drug war. The bar is just that low
I strongly prefer STAR over ranked choice, for some significant issues that aren’t talked about enough. (slide deck).
But yes, I agree that voting reform is critical to this change, and it’s very telling that neither party are very interested in enacting it. They’ll both warn us like an abusive relationship to not vote third party “or else” but when you ask why not just support voting reform they both fall silent.
Capitalism gonna capitalize…
While Republicans prepare for a public debate, Democrats are coronating Biden without any democratic contestation, revealing a glaring hypocrisy. Instead of embracing an open dialogue that could invigorate the electorate, they prefer a managed image, undermining the very principles they claim to uphold. Such practices not only turn off voters but lay bare the profound contradictions within the U.S. political system.
The enthusiasm to vote against rather than for a candidate reveals the deeper crisis of a political system that effectively marginalizes meaningful alternatives.
There’s only been a limited selection up until this point
In examining the intricacies of federation and centralization within the context of a democratic society, we’re faced with a rich tapestry of challenges and opportunities. The Federal Republic of Germany’s response to COVID-19, with its 16 federated states, serves as an illustrative example of a model that facilitates diverse approaches towards a common goal. It’s a demonstration of what can be described as decentralized centralization, allowing for creativity, adaptability, and the potential for mutual learning.
However, the attraction towards centralized leadership, particularly when vested in a single figure, reveals a tendency that should be approached with caution. It often leads to the erosion of democratic principles and individual liberties, a phenomenon not unknown in various historical contexts.
In the digital realm of the Fediverse, we find an interesting parallel. The absence of dark money can be seen as a safeguard against the undue influence of concealed financial interests. It fosters an environment that encourages open dialogue, collaboration, and community-driven decision-making. Yet, the tension between the need for extensive discourse and the desire for immediate action presents a challenge that’s emblematic of democratic processes.
The proposal for the creation of Cartas is an ambitious pursuit, one that seeks to balance the freedoms and responsibilities that define our existence, and in doing so, constructs a framework for a more equitable and humane digital landscape. It’s a path that demands careful consideration, relentless effort, and a commitment to the ideals that underpin the very essence of democracy.
I don’t think people here realize that not holding on to is different from no longer processing the data for their own means… There’s no doubt in my mind that Google just simply has no need to keep the old data around anymore once other processing like for ML models and ad targeting are completed