You can replace the OS on most Android devices.

Specifically- devices made by Google have been unlocked allowing replacement of the software.

You still have to put together a working kernel and drivers, environment, etc.

Not much stopping folks from doing that though.

GrapheneOS, Ubuntu, and others have made headway for some devices.

Each device potentially uses different hardware implementation and features.

Or, maybe writing firmware and code that doesn’t make money is the opposite of profit.

Where is the incentive to write code that reduces security and costs money they won’t recover ?

This is a crowdstrike issue specifically related to the falcon sensor. Happens to affect only windows hosts.

A lot of old consoles are actually based on standard CPUs for the most part. Look at the history of the 6502 for example. Emulating the hardware can be done if time is taken to reverse engineer all the layers into an emulator.

Part of the issue, to me, can be if all the work is done and then copyright disputes arise- all work has to be removed from the public.

Redhat and Debian are separate projects, tmk.

This was a fast response, and doesn’t cover the whole scope of handling networking in docker. As mentioned elsewhere there is a different network philosophy for Standalone Containers & Overlay networking.

You declare the ip in your setup, or in the yaml file. An example for the docker-compose file is in the link below. I’d expect you’ll want to declare the network and such as well, if you’re not familiar.

https://gist.github.com/natcl/3d881d00a56c8a961e6dab8ba51a5a37

Why stop at Trump? If they’re willing to create a dictatorship out of one party, it’s only fair that the other party takes the reins when the opportunity arises. /s

Democrats should clear the senate, house and courts of any dissenters upon the ruling.

Keep seal team 6 on standby to really get the political machine straightened out.

That’s where this goes.

I’d like to see how that works out. I feel like it potentially creates a lockdown on new laws favoring the bias of the judges. A whole new set of individuals who can block progress or laws they disagree with.

Currently bills or amendments can go into committee for refinement, discussion, etc.

In the proposed system - Amendments that refine the existing law overwriting previous laws in their effect and verbiage, couldn’t pass.

In other words, by definition wouldn’t this court reject amendments, preserving the status quo?