Is the article mentioned the criteria for a video? I don’t care enough about it to read the article. Can the video be like one of those YouTube shorts and and still be worth the 25 bucks?
Be nice or be a loser.
Is the article mentioned the criteria for a video? I don’t care enough about it to read the article. Can the video be like one of those YouTube shorts and and still be worth the 25 bucks?
I said I’m no pro and just spitballing, your last line about being a simp is pretty strange.
3 videos a day for 5.5 months (about 167 days). That’s 500 videos. 500 x $25 = $12500, not $1250.
I have no clue if it’s feasible to make three videos a day for 5.5 months, but I guess if the length of the video doesn’t matter then It must be doable.
It could be worth it if they can also make money through other companies for the same videos. Plus if they’re popular enough that Amazon is paying them then they must already be making ad revenue or something.
I don’t know. I’m not a pro, just spitballing.
You’re missing the point entirely 😀
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHA Trump knowing how to play checkers hahahahaha
The point is that news about Twitter rebranding is simply not related to technology. This is a technology community. These submissions should not even be posted in the first place to have the opportunity to be voted on.
“I don’t understand why it exists, so it’s gotta be god.” (Pronounced jod, btw)
If you’re trolling, you’re doing a great job.
On the one hand, Chuck Norris is a weird fucking guy these days.
On the other hand, in the golden age of memes back in like 2011 or whatever, I made a Chuck Norris fact that wasn’t so well received:
Chuck Norris can speak in cursive.
I thought it was pretty good.
Knowing everything about my body.
What is my current blood sugar? O2 level electrolyte status? How much shit do I have in my colon?
You just said admitted to pirating, you little muppet.
Incognito mode is just to keep your family from seeing what you do not from keeping the gubberment