Mr hackerman couldn’t get to the car because it crashed first due to a software bug the customer did not have time to take his car to the shop to fix.
The real world is quite different than the idealistic one.
Mr hackerman couldn’t get to the car because it crashed first due to a software bug the customer did not have time to take his car to the shop to fix.
The real world is quite different than the idealistic one.
And how often were they actually followed vs discarded because the customer just didn’t care?
You do realize your entire first point is invalidated by the comment you’re replying to? I just said the customer has to press a button on their phone to initiate the update. On that same phone they can view release notes that clearly outline the recall. Additional on first use, the car will display those same release notes on the screen.
Sure, safety vs convenience is a huge factor in software development. The biggest factor to safety is unpatched software. You know, the kind that requires significant effort to update, such as needing to bring your car into the shop to apply.
Overall your doom and gloom argument against OTA safety updates is pretty weak.
Right, because the recall for the icons on the screen needing to be a tad bigger is as serious as uncontrolled acceleration of a giant hunk of metal.
They need a new name for software update recalls and physical recalls. They both need to be serious, but a distinction is needed.
Recalls still require the customer to take action. They’re much less likely to go into the shop to have it fixed than press a button on their phone and have the car fix itself overnight.
Your suggestion for not allowing safety software fixes OTA is dangerous.
I don’t know why he’s making this statement. Blizzard doesn’t make games that don’t nickel and dime you, much less ones people feel are worth paying extra for or even worth their cost.
Or because anyone in China working normal hours already left for the weekend because they’re 12+ hours ahead of the US.
At a previous job I had, we were only given options for 1080p monitors. I ended up with a total of 5 and needed all of them.
By today’s standards, that’s a pretty weak CPU at this point. I upgraded from mine not long after the Gamers Nexus review that pegged it at about the same performance as a 10th gen i3. I was already planning to upgrade at that point, but it really was a kicker.
~I wonder if this usage captures vehicles as well. I know the 2016 Honda I owned was running android 4.4 or so.
Actually other person got it wrong, but I can confirm that it is fixed in the latest version. I don’t see examples of this very often, but I did run across one today.
And AMD shitting the bed for 10 of those years.
No text image links in post bodies. Usually see them in the format [](link here) don’t show up at all.
It’s still better than Roku Amazon, Samsung and LGs UIs from my experience.
How about starting with a refreshed Nvidia shield tv using modern hardware.
To be fair, it’s the corporation that lets them do it. They still have their jobs and salaries after all.
Which is just DNS with extra steps
Why use your own resources when you can use someone else’s?
Honestly, that makes sense. Outage reporting service is nice to have. A way to pay your bills is a requirement. They clearly have different SLAs.
The hardware still looks so great, but responsiveness has gone to the shitter in recent years.