Republicans on the House Small Business Committee pressed Energy Secretary Jennifer Granholm on Thursday for answers on proposed energy-efficiency standards for ceiling fans.

The proposed standards were first published in the Federal Register in June, and the comment period closed earlier this week. According to the Energy Department, the rule as applied to standard residential ceiling fans would cut fan-related electricity costs by about 40 percent relative to the least efficient fans currently available.

The House panel presented the rules as burdensome to ceiling fan manufacturers, particularly smaller ones.

“This proposed rule would decrease the maximum estimated energy consumption permissible for large diameter and belt driven ceiling fans,” committee Republicans wrote. “This rule would require numerous small business fan manufacturers to redesign their products and may put between 10 and 30 percent of small business ceiling fan manufacturers out of business. It appears that the Department of Energy may not have properly considered small entities during this rulemaking process.”

An Energy Department spokesperson told The Hill this aspect has been mischaracterized, saying in an email that the one-time total conversion cost would be about $107 million for all manufacturers.

“The incremental cost to consumers is $86.6 million annually, while the operating cost savings are $281 million annually — both at a 7 percent discount rate,” the spokesperson said. “The savings are more than triple the incremental costs.”

The spokesperson noted the standards, “which are required by Congress,” would not be in effect for five years and would save Americans “up to $369 million per year, while substantially reducing harmful air pollution — a crucial fact that some have conveniently failed to mention.”

Efficiency standards for home appliances have become culture war flashpoints under the Biden administration. The administration has restored a number of efficiency rules rolled back under the Trump administration, including for shower heads, water heaters and gas furnaces.

The most umbrage, however, has been reserved for efficiency regulations over gas stoves, beginning last year when Consumer Product Safety Commissioner Richard Trumka Jr. approved a request for information on hazards associated with the devices, which the CPSC formalized in March. Although Trumka has said there are no plans to ban gas stoves, House Republicans have introduced formal legislation this year to legally prevent such a ban.

  • jeffw@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    118
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    Now they’re triggered by ceiling fans. You can’t make this shit up

    • mommykink@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      70
      ·
      1 year ago

      Did you read the article? They’re not triggered by ceiling fans, they’re triggered by more regulations, which is pretty on brand for the conservative platform. Not saying I agree with them but your comment is a complete misrepresentation of the argument.

      • tsonfeir@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        52
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        They sure like to regulate pussy though.

        Also bathrooms. Also library books. Also teaching science, philosophy, psychology. Also “nicknames.” Also men’s hair length. Also prayer (only Christian) in school. Also funding nonprofit schools with public money. Also more taxes for the poor.

      • atzanteol@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        34
        ·
        1 year ago

        they’re triggered by more regulations, which is pretty on brand for the conservative platform

        Is it though? Or is it that it’s not their regulations being enforced.

        • tsonfeir@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          When someone told them to regulate the pussy, they didn’t understand it meant for them to go get laid.

        • mommykink@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          38
          ·
          1 year ago

          How is that a joke? It’s literally the opposite of what’s going on. It would be one thing to say “now they’re triggered over change” but their entire argument is that ceiling fans are fine how they are.

          • ReluctantMuskrat@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            12
            ·
            1 year ago

            As usual Republicans fighting against regulations that will reduce energy consumption and save Americans money. If it were up to Republicans we’d still be using incandescent light bulbs and driving v8 engines that get 10 mpg.

            • mommykink@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              12
              ·
              1 year ago

              I don’t disagree with any of what you said but it’s completely irrelevant to the topic of this post

      • HellAwaits@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        they’re triggered by more regulations, which is pretty on brand for the conservative platform.

        Yeah like trying to regulate people’s literal livelihood? How very libertarian of them.