• Rentlar@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      41
      ·
      4 months ago

      If you can afford it, downtown Vancouver, BC is hostile to cars.

      Parking surcharges (that specifically fund transit), just a few bridges and a couple main roads in and out of downtown.

      Downtown eastside you got homeless people that give no shits and will cross the road whenever and block cars.

      Downtown westside and all around downtown you have bike lanes, lots of people on bikes and many streets that you can’t continue straight unless you are on a bicycle.

      Central downtown has a transit mall that only buses, taxis and local deliveries can use.

      Most of all you have a Costco that you can get to easier by transit, bike or walking than you can by car.

      • traches@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        4 months ago

        People with trouble walking, service vehicles, delivery trucks, and such are fine. Literally nobody says they shouldn’t get to drive. They also represent like .001% of city traffic.

      • uis@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        4 months ago

        People with most disabilities can’t have driver license. But they have powered wheelchairs.

        • Ranger@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          4 months ago

          That’s a couple of bad assumptions right there but let’s put aside your narrow conception of what disabled means, you’re still OK with fucking over some disabled people.

          • Mothproof3007@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            4 months ago

            There are disability adapted bikes that cover a wide range of physical disabilities (I’ve seen up to even only a single arm and head movements). I’m curious what disabilities would actually require exclusively a car for transportation and for which custom bikes wouldn’t be enough, do you know of any ?

            • uis@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              4 months ago

              Bikes require to keep balance. Powered wheelchairs do not.

                  • Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    4 months ago

                    you will find that most people use “bicycle” as a general term for basically anything of vaguely that shape and function.

                    no one (and i use that in the modern sense of “effectively no one”, before you um ackshually me on that) says “cargo tricycle”, they say “cargo bike” or “bakfiets”, and bakfiets just means “cargo/box bike”.

              • Mothproof3007@programming.dev
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                4 months ago

                Yeah, three-wheeled bikes still count as bikes imo, they’re much closer to being bikes than cars.

                But I have nothing against powered wheelchair obviously, they aren’t cars.

          • uis@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            4 months ago

            Everyone who does not have two good eyes, two arms and at least one leg can’t legaly obtain driver’s licese. Meanwhile powered wheelchair does not have such restrictions. Even person with one working muscle can drive powered wheelchair.

            • Ranger@lemmy.blahaj.zone
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              4 months ago

              That’s a subset of disabled people & people without the use of legs or a arm can drive they just need a vehicle with special controls.powered wheelchairs don’t fulfill all travel needs.