“I predict there’ll be some convictions,” speculated the lawyer. “I think the strategy is to get bad convictions, but to get them fast,” he continued, saying that Trump would then be able to appeal the decisions, after the election. Dershowitz argued that this is the reason prosecutors are “rushing” to get their cases against Trump to trial.
He didn’t just say Trump would win on appeal or “He believes there will be convictions but overturned in appeals.” He predicting the approach of the prosecutors and said more than this.
And why does that? His reasoning he states in the articles?
I am not going to read the article to you.
If you don’t get what he’s saying that on you and not an error in what I said.
Have a good day
It is an error on you.
He didn’t just say Trump would win on appeal or “He believes there will be convictions but overturned in appeals.” He predicting the approach of the prosecutors and said more than this.
You are being dishonest.
Well I can tell you’re not a lawyer.
If the conviction is overturned in appeal then Trump wins. That would null the conviction.
Have a good day