• Rakonat@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    30
    ·
    6 months ago

    America literally fought a war to try and prevent that. The majority of the population of Vietnam fought to have this instead.

    • niktemadur@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      6 months ago

      One has to wonder what they would have had if it had gone the other way… would they look more like the Philippines, perhaps, or Indonesia? A “strong man” in Saigon with CIA backing on steroids. Because a whole other kind of just as shitty is still just as shitty.

      • Rakonat@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        I think you’re misunderstanding what I said, US fought a war to stop it the spread of Lenin/Stalin styled authoritarian communism and failed. There never really was a chance for a proper democracy to rise up in such an improverished nation when both sides were going to exploit the hell out of poor workers without adding any significant value to the country or help prop up self sufficient industries.

    • ghost_of_faso2@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      6 months ago

      America literally fought a war to try and prevent that.

      Are you serious?

      America entered the war because France was trying and failing to maintain its slave colony in Vietnam.

      The only thing America was trying to prevent was democracy from manifesting.

    • UsernameIsTooLon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      13
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      That’s what Americans claim to save face. I’m a Vietnamese American and Asian history tends to suck in other nations. America used that narrative to justify invading another country and then dipping out when it was too hard.

      I’m still going to overgeneralize, but here’s the actual history they don’t teach you. (History is much more interesting outside of school).

      From the Vietnamese perspective, they initially didn’t want/need American help, but about HALF of Vietnam didn’t want communism. Similar to Korea, it was kinda like North vs South. America knew that Vietnam has potential to be another booming nation so they saw an opportunity to “help” Vietnam for profit and claim they’re fighting communism in the process. America doesn’t just “help” for the sake of good, we’re a nation of profit and greed.

      During this war, South Korea’s involvement and then eventual American alliance actually helped South Korea flourish from all this new money they were getting. When Nixon saw that Vietnam was a losing war, he pussied out and ended up moving on to help Korea since that was the next “profitable” nation; even helping in “fighting communism” during the Korean War. Vietnam took a huge L after Nixon pumped and pulled resources so he partially caused the loss, too. Looking back now, America made the “right” call on South Korea as it’s now both rich AND has good US relations.

      Most of the Vietnamese population today prefers a less communistic government but not much can be done. Government is just stupid powerful BECAUSE of communism in the first place. Like some long domino effect.

      TL:Dr America is a sneaky country and does things that only benefit them. They couldn’t benefit from Vietnam so they moved onto Korea in “I’m done playing with you” style.

      • OBJECTION!@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        6 months ago

        If the majority of Vietnamese didn’t want communism, why didn’t the anti-communists win even without the US’s help? Your narrative is nonsense.

      • Rakonat@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        Geographically it was half the country, but population wise it was closer to 2/3rd pro communist vs 1/3rd anti communist. US involvement wasn’t really justified to start and mostly sunk cost fallacy with how they tried to support the French rule before France pulled out and US was holding the bag and a doctrinal choice of stopping the spread of communism even when there was little to nothing to gain and only save face. Vietnam was going to have a civil war no matter what but US definitely made it worse and drew out the conflict and ramped up the death toll with nothing to show for it. If the US had any intentions of taking advantage of Vietnam modernising and industrializing they’d have setup southern cities that were more friendly to US investments with trafe and infrastructure. But just like in Korea that wouldn’t happen for decades later, US presence there was entirely military and some very bare bones humanitarian aid.