• CableMonster@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    8 months ago

    People are compiled of their actions and behaviors so I am not really getting what you are trying to say.

    • essell@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      Some traits are inherent / congenital, historically these were used to judge and “cancel” people

      Still are at times

      • CableMonster@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        I dont recall the religious right cancelling people due to their inherent characteristics. On the other hand, the left actively discriminates against people for the same thing.

        • essell@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          8 months ago

          Oh really? I wonder if a religions have ever used gender to define what roles a person can have and who gets a platform?

          I’m not sure if we’re just definitely terms differently or you’re lacking an understanding of history here.

          The religious right has always given a voice to a small number of people and cancelled everyone else

          • CableMonster@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            8 months ago

            So you are going to point to women cant be head pastors in some churches as indication that they cancel people due to inherent characteristics?