markus99@lemmy.world to Linux@lemmy.ml · 9 months agoLinux hits 4% on the desktop 🐧 📈gs.statcounter.comexternal-linkmessage-square235fedilinkarrow-up1981arrow-down119cross-posted to: technology@lemmy.worldtechnology@lemmy.mllinux_gaming@lemmy.worldlinux_gaming@lemmy.mllinux@lemmy.mllinux@lemmy.mllinux_gaming@lemmy.worldlinux_gaming@lemmy.mllinux@lemmy.ml
arrow-up1962arrow-down1external-linkLinux hits 4% on the desktop 🐧 📈gs.statcounter.commarkus99@lemmy.world to Linux@lemmy.ml · 9 months agomessage-square235fedilinkcross-posted to: technology@lemmy.worldtechnology@lemmy.mllinux_gaming@lemmy.worldlinux_gaming@lemmy.mllinux@lemmy.mllinux@lemmy.mllinux_gaming@lemmy.worldlinux_gaming@lemmy.mllinux@lemmy.ml
minus-squarePuddingFeeling [she/her]@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6arrow-down1·9 months agoYeah linux runs on 30+ year old hardware
minus-squareTrainguyrom@reddthat.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·9 months agoI think I saw somewhere that Windows still has scheduled bugs with high core count CPUs so you can legitimately get better performance from Linux because the scheduler has already been optimized for high core count servers
Yeah linux runs on 30+ year old hardware
And brand new $12k CPUs
I think I saw somewhere that Windows still has scheduled bugs with high core count CPUs so you can legitimately get better performance from Linux because the scheduler has already been optimized for high core count servers