Air Canada appears to have quietly killed its costly chatbot support.

  • yamanii@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    51
    ·
    9 months ago

    Experts told the Vancouver Sun that Air Canada may have succeeded in avoiding liability in Moffatt’s case if its chatbot had warned customers that the information that the chatbot provided may not be accurate.

    So why would anybody use a chatbot?

    • jkrtn@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      28
      ·
      9 months ago

      Customers are forced to. Companies would rather give shitty and inaccurate information with the veneer of helping someone rather than pay a human to actually help someone.

      They will continue using chatbots as long as they think it won’t cost them more in lost customers or this sort of billing dispute than it saves them in not paying people. What was this, $600? That’s fuckall compared to a salary. $600 could happen a few hundred times a year and they’d still be profiting after firing some people.

      It’s off for now, but it will return after the lawyers have had a go at making the company not liable for the chatbot’s errors.

      • MrEff@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        9 months ago

        600$

        To employ someone at 10$/hr, their actual cost is probably close to 15$/hr when you factor I them coming in to work in the office and all the costs associated with that. At 15$/hr it takes 40 hrs to cost 600$ to thr company. That is one week of work for one employee. This means that they could have a 600$ fuck up every week and still break even over hiring a person. And we are talking about just one person. Chat support is nor.ally contracted out as entire teams and departments.

      • kent_eh@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        Customers are forced to.

        Only if there are no competing companies who use less shitty tools.

    • Draedron@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      They are useful to handle simple, common questions. But there always should be an option to talk to a human instead.