• Dizzy Devil Ducky@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    9 months ago

    Maybe I’m crazy, but does anyone else see Proton as a double edged sword?

    The way I’ve been seeing it is, yeah, it’s great for Linux users because they get to play games that normally don’t run on Linux with a lot more ease than ever before.

    But on the other hand, I feel as though the biggest triple AAA game studios will see it and use it as an excuse not to create a Linux version of their game.

    • ℍ𝕖𝕝𝕚0𝕤@social.ggbox.fr
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      9 months ago

      That’s a fair point, but proton works so well that native linux games can be a worse experience than windows games via proton, so I don’t really care at the end of the day.

    • c10l@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      9 months ago

      I’m with the others here saying that as long as they make sure it runs on Proton (or even better, plain WINE), I’m ok.

      It matters a lot more whether the game is open source or not than the binary format does. If the game is closed source anyway, there’s not much advantage to it being on a native Linux format.

    • Swarfega@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      9 months ago

      I have the same feeling. Although it may be a good thing too in that developers will at least ensure their game runs correctly via Proton. Better than a game that doesn’t work.

    • festus@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      9 months ago

      Not even just AAA studios, but I’ve seen a lot of indie studios that used to provide Linux builds aren’t anymore in their newer games. Two games that come to mind are Everspace 2 & Talos Principle 2.