• Ashy@lemmy.wtf
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      25
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      For me that was one of the worst financial moves ever made.

        • Ashy@lemmy.wtf
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          48
          ·
          10 months ago

          Well, for the amount of money I spend on hard drives and other hardware I could subscribe to Netflix for about 30 years.

          • TOR-anon1@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            11
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            10 months ago

            How much disk space do you need?

            I have a simple 500GD HDD ($25) and a 230GB (?).

            I also have $120 worth of DVD and CD for ~$60 thanks to Goodwill

            Fits nicely.

              • JamesBean@kbin.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                17
                ·
                edit-2
                10 months ago

                Wild! I’ve got about 40 TB myself, and have never come across someone with more… let alone four times more.

                • Ashy@lemmy.wtf
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  5
                  ·
                  10 months ago

                  40 TB was my previous capacity and based around a really cheap 2 bay NAS with a mess of external USB drives attached and no backup … and is now pretty much full.

                  So I ordered a 12 bay NAS (with, for now 6x 20TB disks) to bascially replace the entire old setup. I’m also planning to put the new setup in RAID 5 or 6, so it will only have an effective storage of 80-100 TB.

            • Salix@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              edit-2
              10 months ago

              Don’t forget some people run RAID, which means you need duplicates of the HDD. That really adds up.

          • Random_Character_A@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            10 months ago

            My only pain is destroying all those VCD/SVCDs and shitload of DVD-Rs full of .avi files.

            All garbage when watching from modern high def TVs.

    • TheSanSabaSongbird@lemdro.id
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      10 months ago

      Yeah, me too. I pat myself on the back for this one nearly every day. Probably the best financial decision I ever made.

      • the_third@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        10 months ago

        There’s still many nuances people get wrong all the time. Did you pick financially independent parents?

        • TheSanSabaSongbird@lemdro.id
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          10 months ago

          Fuck! No, I fucked that one up too and accidentally picked a crazy Haight-Ashbury 1967 hippie together with a seriously damaged Vietnam vet, the two of them getting involved in weird cultish shit long before I was born.

          It was a poor decision on my part. No one to blame but myself.

    • CanadaPlus@futurology.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      Underrated answer. Meritocracy is a lie, folks, even within the West. If you do everything perfectly you will climb a little bit, and only on average. All the counterexamples you’re thinking of are people who won a lottery of some kind. And of course, birth is also a lottery.

  • mrbubblesort@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    74
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    10 months ago

    A literal move actually. 20 years ago I moved from America to a country with universal health care. That has saved my family probably close to a quarter million bucks in health care fees alone.

    • weeeeum@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      10 months ago

      Not to mention the headache. It feels like every time I get treatment I have to argue with my insurance until they eventually cave (assuming it’s something they actually cover). I asked my mom if this is how healthcare is really like and she said “yeah it’s just the culture, it’s normal” acting as it having to beat the fuck out of a metaphorical piñata to pay for life saving treatment is ok or acceptable. Like why the fuck can’t you just pay for the treatment that I fucking pay you to cover?

      • mrbubblesort@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        10 months ago

        Oh god, I hear ya. A long while back I needed some serious treatment and ended up in a hospital for two weeks. It was the first time I had ever gotten truly sick, so I was dreading the final bill. But when the docs said nah you’re good, it’s covered, just take your meds and come back in a week for your follow-up, I damn near died a second time :P

    • Octospider@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      I think I surprising amount of people are likely just “faking it”. I hope one day we can collectively cut the BS and all admit we don’t know what we’re doing.

      • ReadingCat@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        10 months ago

        I think the main problem is that requiring and checking if someone can learn a skill you need is a lot harder than just making the skill a requirement for the job right out of the bat.

        • PuceDogs@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          10 months ago

          Determining if someone can actually learn certain things on the job is pretty difficult in an interview setting, it’s way easier to just do a technical interview.

          The alternative is probably something like a probationary period where you work with no guarantee of continuing but that’s a massive waste of time for everyone involved and not fair to the candidate.

          In my experience, if you go with the candidate that seems the most well rounded, you’ll have the most success. Going with someone that’s a technical genius with no people skills makes it harder to fit them in a spot where they’ll shine - at least in a smaller company

          • morriscox@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            10 months ago

            The first paragraph was easy for my previous employer. At the start of the interview, my interviewer pointed out the wallpaper of his brand new grandson. During the interview he noticed that I kept looking at his monitor. When he asked why I was doing that I asked why he had it on the lowest resolution. We switched places and I changed the resolution. The wallpaper disappeared and my heart felt like it had stopped.

            Thinking quickly, I said that if the picture was on the hard drive that it would have reloaded and it obviously hadn’t been downloaded so it must have been in an email. He smiled and said that I was right and I spent the rest of the interview in his chair and I got a call that day asking if I could come in that day.

      • mamotromico@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        10 months ago

        I honestly can’t deal with all the theatrics of securing a job (interview and first months/year included). This was a setback at first since when people asked me stuff I didn’t know I’d just say “I don’t know” or at most “I heard this and that but never worked with it”.

        Thankfully I ended up at a place that appreciated that frankness and that gives me room (and incentive) to learn new stuff. Every year so far I end up in a new project with different technologies to use and learn. My ADHD brain is extremely satisfied.

      • weeeeum@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        10 months ago

        I think it’s fair considering companies want 4 plus years for an entry position.

      • eran_morad@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        Briefly: phd at Super Prestigious Institution. Fuck it, left science because didn’t want to languish making like $50K/year as a postdoc for like 6-8 years, with no guaranteed path forward. Pivoted toward money & people management. At every step up the ladder, I didn’t know shit. So what? I figured it out. Not that hard. Real talk: I benefitted substantially from elitism. I’m mid forties, salary about $220K, should hit $250K/year in the next 2-5 years.

  • GiddyGap@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    47
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    10 months ago

    Most of the things mentioned in this thread are mostly dumb luck and not necessarily active financial decisions.

    • Chahk@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      10 months ago

      Kind of the point. A lot of financial “success” is nothing but dumb luck.

    • CanadaPlus@futurology.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      If there was an active financial decision you could make and reliably get rich, everyone would do it.

      • GiddyGap@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        Not necessarily rich, but there are active financial decisions you can make that will set you on the path to longterm prosperity. Buying a house at what happened to be exactly the right time and making a $100,000 in 3 years in the process is not one of them. That’s just dumb luck.

        • CanadaPlus@futurology.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          10 months ago

          I mean, “consistently save in a diversified portfolio” would be a pretty boring answer, but it would be an answer I guess. I’m not sure what the equivalent for the poor would be; stay away from substances, maybe?

  • JamesBean@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    44
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago
    • Not having a car (always living/renting in walking or biking distance of my work)
    • Moving in with my partner straight out of college so we could split expenses
    • Moving (with partner) to a low-cost-of-living city for the first 5 years after college
    • Putting most of my medium-term and long-term savings into low-expense-ratio, passively managed index funds starting in my early 20s
    • Buying almost exclusively second-hand clothes, furniture, and cookery
    • Borrowing all desired books (and many desired movies and TV shows) from the library
    • Only buying games when they are bundled or otherwise on steep discount years after release
    • Pirating any other media in which I’m interested if its distributors make it even remotely difficult for me to buy it at a reasonable price
    • Planning all dinners in advance every week before grocery shopping (leads to almost never eating at restaurants or ordering takeout, and almost no food waste because grocery list is based on actual meals)

    Now, if I had to choose the best financial move out of that list? Probably the index funds. Though not having to pay for a car (or car insurance, or car registration, or car repair and maintenance, or parking, or fuel) is a close second.

    • ninjan@lemmy.mildgrim.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      I’m contemplating moving even further towards the lifestyle you have but I struggle with balancing “live for today” vs “live for tomorrow”. In some ways I think we live too much for today, we rarely wait more than a month or two with buying whatever we feel we “need”. We go on vacation abroad every other year at least and do activities monthly that most other families in our neighborhood do maybe yearly or quarterly. Partly because we have much higher income than our neighbors but we could of course save more and if we really buckled down we could likely by financially independent in less than 20 years.

      How do you balance and how do you think regarding these matters, what’s your philosophy?

      • JamesBean@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        I’ve never felt I’m not living for today. Admittedly, most of what I want to do is consume a variety of media within the comfort of my home. But we also travel abroad every other year or so, and that’s probably the biggest ‘entertainment’ expense in our lives. If we need a car to visit someone or somewhere outside the range of public transit or biking, we just rent one for the weekend (probably happens about once a year). We don’t have to hesitate before choosing to do that because we know we’re living well within our means the rest of the time.

        The thing is, once you’re in the habit of doing this stuff, it doesn’t feel like an imposition. It’s just the way your life works. It was actually a bit of a struggle to remember all of those points when I was writing up that list yesterday, because it’s all just natural to me now. There are probably a few more things we do along these lines that haven’t occurred to me.

        And at that point, the savings are just a natural choice for what to do with all the surplus money. It’s not even ‘living for tomorrow.’ It ceases to be an either/or situation. It’s living for today in such a way that you can continue to live for today throughout your entire life.

        Also, there are a huge number of non-financial benefits on offer here, too: walking and biking at times you’d otherwise be driving is excellent for your health; planning meals allows you to choose healthier options, cut down on red meat consumption, etc; meal planning, buying second-hand goods, and not driving reduces dependency on online mega-retailers, international sweatshop labor, and environmentally harmful practices; making use of the library system indirectly supports its continued existence for folks who have no other options; and on and on.

        Anyway, I wouldn’t recommend trying to do all of this at once if it’s all a change for you. I’d recommend slowly introducing each of these practices over time so you have time to get used to each in isolation.

  • TheOlympian@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    40
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    In 2017 my landlord raised my rent from $1k to $1100 a month for the place I rented with my daughter because I finally broke down and got her a dog. I was annoyed because this wasn’t in the lease but I was month to month by this time and figured I could probably get a house around me for the same cost and at least I’d be building equity. I closed in 2018 on a $120k fixer upper on 12 acres. I got a $30k rehab loan and my mortgage/insurance/property tax payment ended up being just over $1100. I spent 7 months in major renovations.

    Fast forward to today, I have a 2.875% mortgage rate with just over $1000 a month all in payment (early COVID refi saved me about $100/month), my house was just appraised for $415k, and I was able to sell 5 acres of the land for a total of about $160k.

    A free shelter dog ended up turning $150k into $575k. 10/10 would recommend.

    • kralk@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      10 months ago

      I was gonna say buying a house too. Mortgage payments are 1/3 what my rent was, and rents have doubled since then.

      • hamburglar26@wilbo.tech
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        I’m in the process of buying right now, and my mortgage is similar to my high rent and the overall cost of ownership is higher, but it’ll be worth it just to get off of the uncertainty of ever increasing rent. At this point it feels like now or never with how batshit insane the housing market has become.

    • Original@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      10 months ago

      Life changing circumstances, but big props on you for having the confidence to go through with it! Life presented you with the opportunity and you seized it!

  • bestusername@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    10 months ago

    Leaving Sydney for a cheaper quieter life in Central West NSW!

    Nice 4 bedroom home with views, 1200m² block with trees, quiet area, school almost across the road, close to everything else and best of all, a tiny manageable mortgage!

    • unknowing8343@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      Yes! Particularly if your job is industrial, get a house somewhere else, but not on the city. Try to find a place with good public transport to the city, tho. Cities will be slowly quitting car infrastructure.

      • bestusername@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        Industrial? There a hundreds of everyday jobs that pay the same no matter where you live in Australia.

        And I didn’t leave Sydney to spend 4hrs on a train.

      • anon6789@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        Bogleheads Guide to Investing - First Edition PDF

        Book Summary on Bogleheads Wiki

        Bogleheads Wiki

        This is somewhat of a speed run of the book.

        The Bogleheads philosophy is basically to buy everything with a 2 or 3 fund portfolio.

        • Total Stock Fund
        • Total Bond Fund
        • Total International Fund

        The linked documents will explain those in more detail, but the concept is to buy everything so you always have bought the biggest winners, not to bet on a handful that will all lose or win, but at bigger expense to you.

        They’ll tell you how much to buy of each and what type of account to keep it in to max tax effectiveness.

        It’s not complicated once you read the source, and anyone should be able to understand it, it’s not written to be cryptic or to sell you something. You can put your money anywhere you choose and it works the same.

        I’ve followed it for about 15 years or so and have been very happy. There’s no checking on stock news or any of that BS, you just develop a plan you’re comfortable with, and then stick to it. The more hands off you are, the better honestly.

          • anon6789@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            10 months ago

            Of course! The hardest part is usually just getting started, so there’s no need to overcomplicate.

            For those also saying “well look at this rich person with money to invest over here,” you can also read this stuff and be a step or two ahead when you do get to invest, because one of the first things it explains is prioritizing where to put money. Fill up one level before moving on to the next, but by reading ahead, you know what to do when you get there so you are prepared.

            Money for us non-uber rich folk works best with time, so the sooner you get in the game, the more success you should have overall. They call this “getting rich slowly” which doesn’t sound exciting, but that’s the point. Most people don’t want to be on an emotional roller coaster with their money, they’d rather be on a lazy river ride that gets then where they want to be.

      • PuceDogs@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        10 months ago

        The nice thing is that, physically it’s the easiest thing in the world. The only complicated part is not trying to game it or convince yourself that you need more than the 2 or 3 fund portfolio.

        Just buy a Total market index fund, some sort of bond fund and maybe some total market international stock fund

  • intensely_human@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    10 months ago

    As 2023 was beginning I set a goal that I would have $5k in the bank no matter what.

    Up to this year I’ve been living paycheck to paycheck. But resolving to save up $5k pushed me out of that for the first time ever.

    I never did hit $5k. But I stopped living paycheck to paycheck. I haven’t checked my balance before paying rent since february of last year. I always have enough, and I just pay the bill.

    • Original@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      10 months ago

      The amount of stress that immediately goes away when you are able to stop the paycheck to paycheck cycle is priceless. Nice work!

      • intensely_human@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        10 months ago

        It also helps that I’ve got a little financial system going.

        I get paid every two weeks. My rent is about 1200. Each paycheck is about 1200 - 1400. Paid every two weeks. Each paycheck, 1000 goes into my “bills” account, and the remainder into my “spending” account. So each paycheck I get about $300 for groceries, coffee, entertainment, whatever.

        All the bills are on auto-pay to draw from that bills account, and the 1000 per paycheck is enough to cover all my bills plus save some. So my savings is accumulating in the bills account.

        I also got myself a credit card for the first time in twenty years, and now my phone bill’s being auto-paid from that, with the CC being auto-paid from the bills account.

        That structure helps too. But I wouldn’t have been able to start it without a lump of cash on hand

    • CanadaPlus@futurology.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      10 months ago

      Pretty much the same. Bought some Bitcoin in high school in the early 10’s. It was just a novelty and I was a kid, so I didn’t buy much, but if someone was kidnapped or something it would be worth it to go through my old drives.

      • Psythik@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        BTC recently got approved to be traded as an ETF by the SEC, so now’s a good time to find that drive cause the price is only going to go up over the next 5+ years.

        • CanadaPlus@futurology.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          Yeah, I’m not going to get rid of any. I was doing everything on thumb drives at the time, though, so it would be a bitch to actually try and find the exact one I used.

          Of course, the value of the things will go to 0 whenever Q-day happens, and hopefully sooner when people realise it’s a badly designed cryptocurrency. Maybe I should dig the old wallet up just to move things to an alt coin.

  • amzd@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    28
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    10 months ago

    Deciding not to get a car; it saves ~400.000 euros in my lifetime which at 40k net a year income means 8-10 year earlier pension

    • GiddyGap@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      10 months ago

      Ahh, European public transportation. Not an option in the US unless you live in NYC and rarely leave the city.

        • Psychodelic@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          I legit can’t tell if you’re being sarcastic. lol

          I can’t imagine being ok with a 4-hr daily commute in a private car with all the amenities, much less one on a public train.

          You’re way tougher than I am, if you’re serious, I’ll say that!

          • saigot@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            10 months ago

            A public train or bus is a way nicer commute than in a car. In a car you can’t really do anything but drive. On a train you can do just about any seated task. I wfh now but when I didn’t I would login and start work during my commute.

            • Psychodelic@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              10 months ago

              Fair enough. I’ve only had to use a train in one city when I would go to the airport and that shit was terrifying sometimes. Also, I can just listen to an audiobook if I’m trying to be productive in the car

    • weeeeum@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      I’m so jealous. My work is only a mile away, which in a perfect world I could walk in 10 mins, but because of many slow crosswalks and busy intersections it’s like 30 mins freezing my balls off. Plus there’s a section of road that’s 40mph (64kmh) with no sidewalk, and a bridge that forces pedestrians onto the high speed road. It’s both slow and basically suicide if I tried to make a habit of walking.

      There’s another route but the intersection I would need to cross is excruciatingly slow. I had to sit for 15 minutes before I could cross. Plus it’s another 40mph road and if someone runs a red I basically die.

      • ggwithgg@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        Damn if I hear this I am so glad to live in the Netherlands. Infrastructure here is designed such that everybody takes a bike or walk if within a few miles, on safe roads

        • weeeeum@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          10 months ago

          It’s unfortunate that much of the US is stuck in a feedback loop of people saying “walking sucks, I’ll drive”, roads and driving infrastructure are improved at the cost of pedestrian infrastructure, more people say “walking sucks”, and repeat. Eventually you get like 12 lane highways at the cost of many sidewalks, bike lanes and tram/train lines being bulldozed.

          Eventually everybody has to drive because pedestrians have been squeezed out of the equation. It saddens me that people don’t realize how nice walking could be, because they have only experienced poor pedestrian infrastructure. Even people like me who would love to walk have to choose driving or a death wish.

          That being said it is slowly improving, many towns near me are implementing bike lanes, and more side walks. Unfortunately the bike lanes are the “safety paint” variety but it’s at least something. As mentioned before my little town is renovating town square and it’s a lot more walkable. Unfortunately not that helpful for me because the town square is only like 600 feet in size (200 metres) in size, but again, it’s something.

          I would love to visit Amsterdam just to walk my little butt off haha

      • amzd@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        40mph is 64kmph not 93kmph but yeah that’s still uncomfortable to bike besides if it’s busy. I’d say instead of posting it here, send a letter to your local government.

        • weeeeum@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          My bad, I have changed it now. Thankfully my town is already working on it, I’m just waiting for the pedestrian infrastructure to spread beyond the town square.

    • GreatAlbatross@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      10 months ago

      I keep meaning to look at exactly what my small car costs per year.
      Last estimate was £1000 a year on fuel, parts, and maintenance.

      Which is equivalent to 50+ hours of car club use.
      For now, I have too many “shit, I need to get this large/heavy object 5 miles away” moments to make it worth it.
      But long term, I kinda like the idea of not having to worry about the car.

      • amzd@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        Insurance and depreciation are the bigger costs I think, but even ignoring those; if you have “heavy objects” less than once a week it would probably still be cheaper to just rent a van when you need it. Convenience might be an argument but yeah that’s what you pay the big bucks for.

        • GreatAlbatross@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          That figure actually includes depreciation and insurance! In fact, almost half of it is just the bloody insurance… Though I should possibly make an allowance in the figure for future repair work, as it’s an older car.

          I think once my big project (and associated last second trips to the builder’s merchant) is finished, I’ll have a go at living without the car.
          My housemates may not be too happy about the private taxi service shutting down though!

    • AdolfSchmitler@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      10 months ago

      Same here! Spent about $100 for my vasectomy after insurance. Best $100 I ever spent really, saved me hundreds of thousands.