• missing_forklift@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    this article is about changes to solid electrolyte only, you’d know that if you read the article. these have less conductivity ( = lower power density) tho

    And have better capacity and a longer life?

    it took 9 months of real lab work by real material scientists just to make it work, things like dendrite formation or swelling aren’t part of this optimization (well at least AI stage), the linked preprint doesn’t even mention dendrites once

    • Cyborganism@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      you’d know that if you read the article

      Oof. You got me there lol.

      I read the article and this one line stood out.

      It stood out because half of what Murugesan would have expected to be lithium atoms were replaced with sodium.

      This isn’t new I think. Sodium-ion batteries were already known. Maybe there was still dendrite formation and this recipe might reduce or eliminate that? We’ll have to wait and see.

      In any case, if it can drastically reduce lithium usage that would be good progress.

      • missing_forklift@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        sodium isn’t electroactive there tho, it’s just a part of electrolyte. also dubious if you can make savings on lithium work if one option for anode is solid lithium metal