A transgender woman running for an Ohio House seat has been disqualified for failing to disclose her former name on petitions circulated to voters, in violation of a seldom-enforced state law.

Local election officials informed Vanessa Joy, who hoped to run as a Democrat for Ohio House District 50, that she was not eligible to do so, despite having collected the signatures necessary to run.

Joy sought to run in a firmly Republican district covering Stark County, just south of Akron.

  • admiralteal@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    The rule is only enforced for transgender people, though, and specifically exempts some other kinds of name changes that are considered more ‘socially acceptable’ to these fuckwits.

    So no, if the cisgendered people do not need to disclose, neither do the transgendered people. That’s called discrimination on the basis of sex.

    Disclose previous names, please. There were full records of the legal name change. Nothing was hidden. The forms didn’t even have the fucking disclosure requirements on them because no one gives a shit about this law.

    This is strictly an anti-trans rule at this point and you’re here rushing to its defense based on some law and order conservative bullshit.

    • Doorbook@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      15
      ·
      11 months ago

      Lets be clear, this incident can be anti-trans or anti-democrat. Regardless, the rule is not enforced by good faith as it never been enforced before.

      However, in general, anyone who changed their name should disclose that, not necessary the name but knowing someone change their name is important specifically if such person want to hold a public position.

      • admiralteal@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        18
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        11 months ago

        The legal name change is all the disclosure you need. That’s a matter of public record. No one is concealing their identity if they’re using their full government name.

        The idea that some kind of subterfuge may happen without this law is plainly preposterous. You’re steelmanning it for no reason.