A transgender woman running for an Ohio House seat has been disqualified for failing to disclose her former name on petitions circulated to voters, in violation of a seldom-enforced state law.

Local election officials informed Vanessa Joy, who hoped to run as a Democrat for Ohio House District 50, that she was not eligible to do so, despite having collected the signatures necessary to run.

Joy sought to run in a firmly Republican district covering Stark County, just south of Akron.

  • Silverseren@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    She should push for it being applied to all the other politicians in the Ohio House. Any single one of them that had any form of name change for any reason or took the name of their spouse. They all need to be disqualified and kicked out, if we’re going to be enforcing this old ass law.

    • Kepabar@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      The law doesn’t apply to changes due to marriage.

      There probably aren’t too many others who have had a name change.

      • Silverseren@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        If the reason for this law is to not have someone change their name to hide some negative past from voters, a marriage name change is still just as concealing. Sally Smith to Sally Michaels when there are thousands of Sally’s out there is just as much hiding as anything else.

        • Kepabar@startrek.website
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Honestly, it’s really not. It’s rather trivial to find marriage records to find the original name.

          Maybe it’s the same for legal name changes, I don’t know. I’ve never searched for it before.

          But anytime I’ve had to find out someone’s maiden name, it’s been trivial for me to do so.

          • Silverseren@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Maybe it’s the same for legal name changes, I don’t know.

            It is, I’ve done it. Any form of name change is just as easy to look up as marriage records, since changing your last name in the latter uses the same legal process as the former. Since it’s still just a name change.

        • AA5B@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          The first approach should be to make sure the law is applied equally. If it exempts marriage, then there’s a good chance it is being applied “equally”, if there’s no other candidate it applies to

          THEN you might argue the law is invalid because it’s discriminatory…. If there’s no other candidate it applies to, then you should have a good case to invalidate the law. You probably won’t help in time for an upcoming though

    • cheese_greater@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      So we agree? I’m not so naïve to totally discount bad-faith on the part of “the system” but yeah, I disagree that anybody is exempt from revealing publicly who they were on the way to who they are today, both in life and candidacy.