If Dems Wanted to Stop School Shootings Why Are They Against This? #Shorts | DM CLIPS | Rubin Report
youtu.be
Dave Rubin of “The Rubin Report” shares a clip of Ted Cruz sharing the receipts proving the Democrats aren't really willing to do what might be necessary to ...

The safest places in the world are protected with armed guards.

The majority of mass shootings happen in “gun free” zones.

If you want to stop the crimes, you put people in place to prevent the crimes from happening.

The left doesn’t care about stopping crime, they just want to disarm you.

  • DarkGamer@kbin.social
    0·
    1 year ago

    False dichotomy: The article presents the argument as a binary choice between armed law enforcement on campus and restricting the constitutional rights of law-abiding citizens. This oversimplifies the issue and ignores other potential solutions or approaches to school safety.

    Cite where it does this. The only dichotomy presented there is whether Cruz is lying. (He is.)

    Anecdotal evidence: The article relies on specific incidents, such as the Uvalde and Santa Fe shootings, to argue against the effectiveness of armed law enforcement in preventing school shootings. While these incidents are important to consider, they alone do not provide a comprehensive assessment of the issue.

    WTF? As you acknowledge yourself, THEY CITE MULTIPLE PAPERS IMMEDIATELY AFTER THIS. This article/argument does not rely on anecdotal evidence to make its case, even if it includes some.

    Cherry-picked evidence: The article selectively presents examples and studies that support the argument against armed law enforcement on campuses while downplaying or omitting evidence that may contradict it. This creates a biased view of the topic. … The article quotes experts and studies to support its claims, presenting them as the definitive authority on the matter. However, there are conflicting studies and opinions on the effectiveness of armed law enforcement in schools, and relying solely on one set of experts or studies can be misleading. … Lack of counterarguments: The article does not present counterarguments or alternative perspectives to the claim that armed law enforcement is an effective tool for keeping kids safe in schools. This one-sided presentation of the issue limits a comprehensive understanding of the topic.

    So present them. You have yet to present links to any studies or experts to refute these many papers presented, just a video of constant liar Ted Cruz spewing more lies.