Donald Trump has launched a fresh tirade on both the judge and his chief court clerk in his New York civil fraud trial just hours after a gag order banning him from criticising court personnel was paused.

Judge Arthur Engoron had issued the gag order in the case after the former president made a series of false and disparaging remarks about his chief clerk of court Allison Greenfield both to reporters outside the courtroom and on his Truth Social account.

Mr Trump had already violated the gag order twice and incurred $15,000 in fines as a result.

  • Fades@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    217
    ·
    1 year ago

    But he isn’t anybody else, he is the ex president. So what’s the point of saying this?

    There is absolutely zero precedent for any of this

    • lurch (he/him)@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      133
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      The point is everyone should be treated equally. It should not matter for this, if someone is a beggar, fraud or a former president (or in this case all of it). And this is not just a US thing. It’s an ethics thing. It should be like that eveywhere.

      • A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        39
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        everyone should not be treated equally.

        People entrusted to service the public good, either as police, or municiple/state/government officials, (and other people in positions of power over others, such as doctors/etc, but thats another topic) are people that are given elevated positions, and such should be held to a higher standard for violating the trust and authority they’ve been entrusted with, and should face far more severe punishments than a kid getting caught with weed in his pocket.

        • ChunkMcHorkle@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          Unfortunately, when it comes to their own ethical standards, the words of the Supreme Court are utterly meaningless, in the exact same way their new “Ethics Code” is without teeth.

          Their words are hot wind, signifying nothing – unless you are in the market to buy Clarence and Ginni Thomas a new motorhome or give Alito a ride on your new Gulfstream V to your private Alaskan fishing camp, in which case you actually get to choose their words, lol.

    • dwalin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      42
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      One more reason he should serve as example. Nobody should be above the law

    • A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      35
      ·
      1 year ago

      Hes not avoiding jail cause hes an ex-president.

      hes avoiding jail for being a rich white conservative.

      If this was a democrat accused of doing what he’d done, they’d be in prison waiting for trial due the preponderance of evidence, or at least home arrest and a severe order against talking about this shit online.

      and the blue voting public frothing if he got home arrest over jail.

      Trump flouts the courts authority, and the way of law, in a way only rich white conservatives can historically get away with. To the glory and admiration of his base.

      Thats the point of saying it.

    • RileyNorman@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      There’s loads of precedent. Who his former employer was is irrelevant. If he broke a law, any law, precedent is what has happened when others have broken those same laws.

    • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      But he isn’t anybody else, he is the ex president. So what’s the point of saying this?

      But we’re not a nation of laws, we’re a nation of men. So what’s the point of saying this?