• Sanctus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    43
    ·
    1 year ago

    Doesn’t believe in the separation of Church and State? What the fuck is up with this bullshit? I don’t want to hear a globdam word about the founding fathers then. Fucken hypocrites.

    • spaceghoti@lemmy.oneOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      1 year ago

      Since the truth doesn’t serve their agenda, they claim the truth is subject to interpretation and what the Founders really meant was exactly what people like Barton and Johnson say they did.

      When you can’t win with logic, you dazzle 'em with bullshit.

  • MedicsOfAnarchy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    35
    ·
    1 year ago

    I find the covenant contract very interesting. " sign a binding contract agreeing that they would divorce only in the case of abuse, abandonment, imprisonment of a spouse, or lengthy separation. A covenant couple, no matter how miserable, cannot simply decide to divorce."

    No mention of infidelity?

    • Telorand@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I could see them justifying infidelity as abuse or abandonment. I used to be a fundie, and Correctly Interpreting™ words to mean what they don’t mean is practically a sport.

    • Neato@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      1 year ago

      Lengthy separation? Like a lot of couples do before or during divorce processing? Perhaps it’s worded strongly but otherwise that seems as easy out.

      And unless this is just a legal contact with financial penalty, i.e. a prenup, then it’s just for show. There’s no way to enforce this legally to actually prevent divorce.

      You can’t sign your rights and privileges away to be enforced as anything but civil law.

    • BilboBargains@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      It’s pretty flimsy, like any marriage contract. Someone could be banging choir boys every day and the only thing the wife couldn’t do is quickly divorce. Very few are using this legal device anyway, it feels more like political window dressing for stupid people, which is most of the electorate.

    • SCB@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      No mention of infidelity?

      There is a 0% chance this dude gets laid.

  • perviouslyiner@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    1 year ago

    He often gives sermons of a political nature at churches” - might want to let the tax office know about that one.

    • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      The only way that will actually be enforced is if churches start openly endorsing Democrats and opposing Republicans.

  • lagomorphlecture@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Didn’t click through. I’m just going to assume he’s married to his “mother” like Mike Pence.

    • SCB@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Don’t kink shame Mike Pence’s Domme. She didn’t do anything except punish that bad, bad boy.