From the linked article…

In a day and age when literally everyone connected to a film production gets a credit, from craft services to on-set teachers of child actors to random “production babies” who didn’t even work on a film, it is utterly incomprehensible that vfx artists, whose work makes possible the final images that appear onscreen, are routinely omitted from screen credits.

I can attest to this, having worked in the field. Most of the work in TV and cinema goes uncredited, with team leaders or just the post houses at most being recognized with an end credit placement (by contract, of course). I understand totally that it is always a team effort and hardly any of the viewing public sits through the entire end credits roll. I totally get it. But when it happens that you are included, that small token of recognition does remind you why you’re doing 12-hour days erasing power lines, making day look like night, adding/removing people and/or signage from shots they weren’t supposed to be in and pushing greenscreened people in front of moving cars.

!moviesnob@lemmy.film

  • drhandsome@lemmy.film
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    As someone who had his name left out of film credits before (actually, it listed the guy’s name who didn’t get the role I got instead of mine), I know how this stings. Sadly film & television is full of neglectful morons, they fuck up, ultimately all you can do is move on.

    • account_2@lemmynsfw.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      At some point, when it comes to the way VFX people are treated in the industry, it goes beyond simple neglect imo. These people are constantly being fucked over.

  • Frogodendron@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I don’t understand why this keeps happening. It’s zero effort to add a person, a dozen or even a thousand to the list, and nobody loses anything by simply writing in a name.

  • WarmSoda@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    He also claims there isn’t even one CGI shot in the entire film. I don’t believe that. There aren’t any backgrounds filled in at all? No touch ups? If he used matte paintings you would be able to tell with IMAX, there’s too much definition to pass off a painting.

    • King Mongoose@lemmy.filmOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      While I will agree that maybe Sir Christopher is possibly stretching the truth regarding CGI (it’s entirely possible there isn’t one entire, totally computer-generated shot), but computer-aided, computer-enhanced, no. Especially in this day and age, everything is touched by Inferno/Flame/Smoke/Nuke/AE/Blender/Maya/blah blah blah.

      When you say “matte painting” you mean traditional, non-digital, paint-on-glass? Forgive my ignorance, but why would that be any more or less noticible in IMAX?

      • WarmSoda@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Imax has a huge resolution. It’s like watching a 4k copy of an old movie and being able to see how fake the materials used were.

    • lloram239@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I don’t believe that.

      Given how extremely lackluster that nuclear explosion looked, it can’t be that far off from the truth.

  • Diabolo96@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    And you have the other side of movie credits where they add the crew pets , new born kids and deceased during filming.

    I geuss that for a movie like Oppenheimer the credit would last longer than the movie itself.

    • King Mongoose@lemmy.filmOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      🙄 While I’d agree with you if I didn’t doubt you about credited pets and kids without actual roles, I’m pretty certain nobody has a problem with the memorial title cards.

      • Diabolo96@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I barely watch any movie and yet i saw pets and new born being credited. It happens, their’s no doubt about it. As for the memorial, i didn’t say it was a bax thing. Neither of this is a bad thing. i was just pointing at something i observed that is in a striking contrast with 80% of the vfx team being uncredited in Oppenheimer.

  • GlendatheGayWitch@lib.lgbt
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I wouldn’t think the recognition from the public would be main reason. I figured that the biggest reason you’d want the credit is for future employers to see your name attached to a film. I would imagine they would be the ones to either sit through credits or search a credits database to see who worked on which films or worked on films recently.

  • Blackmist@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I think the various unions are the only reason anybody gets a credit at all. George Lucas got fined for not putting enough credits at the start of Star Wars, iirc.

    Kind of sucky that people get no credit, although sitting through the credits of Red Dead Redemption 2 will probably give an idea of why they don’t list everybody at every studio and contracted company that worked on it, since they were about half an hour long.

    • cryball@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      The fine Lucas got was from omitting the director’s credit from the start of the movie. It’s not like anybody was defending the guys doing the work behind the scenes.

      Relevant wikipedia entry

      This might be a needless nitpick, but had to bring it up, as it’s not the first time I’ve come across this.

      • Blackmist@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yeah, that’s the one. The director’s guild (not union, although I guess similar) imposed the fine, even though it was his own name he omitted.

        Even James Earl Jones didn’t get a credit although that was at his own request apparently. He’d rattled through the lines in like 2 hours, pocketed his money and went home. Didn’t feel he’d deserved it, vs the poor guy who’d sweated in a suit for weeks and didn’t even get to be seen or heard.

  • thisisdee@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Is that really up to Nolan? I don’t know anything about the industry but is a director in charge of making sure everyone is credited?

    • sabreW4K3@lemmy.tf
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      He’s also a producer in all his films. He definitely has the clout and oversight to ensure its done. But he’s also a luddite and so it’s not natural for his brain to consider things like that. Remember, this is a guy that doesn’t even have a mobile phone.

      • ShroOmeric@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        a luddite?
        that’d quite pathethic coming from someone working at the top of one of the most technology-dependent industry existing today…

  • sed11q@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    People who think a Hollywood director sits down with a list of names and reviews all the credits should really get a reality check. Thousands of people work on a film like this, and sometimes not even directly with the director. In case of these VFX artist they were most probably a third party studio not at all affiliated with Nolan. How should he know who works for one of their service providers.

  • SineNomineAnonymous@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    “forgot”. The guy really went above and beyond to sell his gimmick “no cgi”. I’ve even seen some of his fanatics defend this by saying “IMAX reels can only hold 3 hours of film which is why the CGI people had to be removed from credits”. As if they couldn’t have been credited early in the credits and as if the movie wasn’t less than 3 hours (don’t know where that person was but where I am, the movie is supposed to last 2h40 something minutes, aka less than 3 hours)

    • TRSea@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      The official runtime is 180 minutes exactly, so actually is 3 hours.

  • Ulrich_the_Old@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I gave up on movies the moment jar jar binks appeared on screen. I walked out and have never been back. However when I did watch movies, I always watched to the end of the credits as the musicians were always last. I am a musician.