RothyBuyak@lemmy.blahaj.zone to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 1 year agoThis (rule)slemmy.blahaj.zoneimagemessage-square173fedilinkarrow-up1880arrow-down10file-text
arrow-up1880arrow-down1imageThis (rule)slemmy.blahaj.zoneRothyBuyak@lemmy.blahaj.zone to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 1 year agomessage-square173fedilinkfile-text
minus-squareGabu@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·1 year agoLargely, yes. Bicycles are a better, healthier way to move distances longer than 100-ish meters, ideally are only powered by human effort and move at speeds low enough that accidents are absurdly unlikely.
minus-squareLucyLastic@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 year agoWouldn’t that make it a bikeable city? I live in Europe, not about to break out the bike to go less than a couple of km
minus-squareGabu@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·1 year agoThat too, but a walkable city by necessity also becomes a bikeable city.
minus-squareLucyLastic@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 year agoI thought it was just funny that the term “walkable” for some people invokes the idea of using bikes
Largely, yes. Bicycles are a better, healthier way to move distances longer than 100-ish meters, ideally are only powered by human effort and move at speeds low enough that accidents are absurdly unlikely.
Wouldn’t that make it a bikeable city?
I live in Europe, not about to break out the bike to go less than a couple of km
That too, but a walkable city by necessity also becomes a bikeable city.
I thought it was just funny that the term “walkable” for some people invokes the idea of using bikes