• Flying Squid@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    15 days ago

    As I suggested to someone else, without any of us actually reading the paper, and I know I do not have the requisite knowledge to understand it if I did, dismissing it with words like “moronic” is not warranted. And as I also suggested, I don’t think such a word can generally be applied to Caltech studies. They have a pretty solid reputation as far as I know.

    • Buffalox@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      15 days ago

      I’m not fucking reading a paper with such ridiculous claims, I gave it a chance, but it simply isn’t worth it. And I understand their claims and argumentation perfectly. They simply don’t have a clue about the things they make claims about.
      I’ve been investigating and researching these issues for 40 years with an approach from scientific evidence, so please piss off with your claims of me not understanding it.

      • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        15 days ago

        Without evaluating the data or methodology, I would say that the chance you gave it was not a fair one. Especially since you decided to label it “moronic.” That’s quite a claim.

        • Buffalox@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          15 days ago

          It’s 100% moronic, they use terminology that clearly isn’t fit for the task.

          • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldOP
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            15 days ago

            “100% moronic” is an even bolder claim for someone who has not evaluated any of the claims in the paper.

            One might even say that calling scientific claims “100%” false is a not especially scientific approach.

            • Buffalox@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              15 days ago

              If the conclusion is moronic, there’s a pretty good chance the thinking behind it is too.
              They did get the thing about thinking about one thing at a time right though. But that doesn’t change the error of the conclusion.