• Jumuta@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    2 hours ago

    “chrome was hogging up my ram” is the dumbest part of all of this lmao, this person’s decisionmaking is completely driven by placebo and it’s hilarious

    • Tangentism@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 hour ago

      If it wasnt beaten by this, it comes a very close 2nd: “Firefox is trash at loading HTML websites”.

      You can tell that fucker spends their time gibbering techno waffle bollcoks to old people!

  • Badland9085@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    2 hours ago

    There’s worse.

    They already know everything about me anyways. If I can exchange my data for some free and easy to use service, I’m more than happy to give.

    I hate defeatism.

    • Tangentism@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 hour ago

      Its not even defeatism, its willingly sacrificing themselves to the machine in hopes it will be merciful!

      • Badland9085@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        59 minutes ago

        True.

        And they’ll follow that up with a somewhat snarky comment that “You’ll be eliminated by the machines first.”

  • Daniel@lemdro.id
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    32 minutes ago

    I don’t think I’ve had an issue on Firefox other than some sites saying “unsupported browser,” which is really the site’s fault.

  • Ookami38@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 hours ago

    I mean, yeah, privacy isn’t really a thing in our digital surveillance age. Doesn’t mean I’m not gonna make it as hard as possible for them. Make em work for it.

  • AAA@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    35
    ·
    4 hours ago

    The claim to have “nothing to hide” was not just born our of ignorance, but also out of comfort - to not having to do anything about it.

    Now that even the last one accepted that they do indeed have something to hide, but in order to justify their own inaction, it’s labeled as inevitable: privacy is not real.

    They are lying to themselves, because doing otherwise would mean they have to admit being wrong.

    • Manalith@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      43 minutes ago

      The ‘nothing to hide’ argument seems a lot like that ‘first they came for socialists and I did not speak out, because I was not a socialist…’ quote. Sure you have nothing to hide right now, but what happens when something you weren’t hiding becomes a target.

  • Todd Bonzalez@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 hours ago

    I use Edge on my work laptop because:

    • Vertical Tabs
    • Logs into my SSO account
    • Leaks info from my computer like a sieve (it’s my employer’s info, and they don’t deserve privacy)
  • NaNin@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    36
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    5 hours ago

    A lot of people have just accepted surviellance for convienience.

    People close to me get TSA precheck even though it requires fingerprinting, because “the government already has your fingerprints”

    But if they did, why would they need to ask your for them?

    • octochamp@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Sorry for devil’s advocate here because I agree with you but hypothetically the answer would be verification. ie., Google already has your password, so why would they need to ask you for it when you log in?

    • brygphilomena@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Depending on what people do, the government already has their fingerprints.

      Personally, I work around schools so I had to get a background check and fingerprinted for that. I also am licensed to handle explosives, both federally and at the state level. I been fingerprinted for that. I’ve gone through TSA for hazmat endorsement on a commercial driver’s license. That needed fingerprints and a background check.

      Getting fingerprinted to get through airport security is the least of my privacy concerns.

      But my threat model isn’t the TSA. They aren’t a concern of mine, although I do opt out of their facial recognition.

      I am concerned with internet surveillance, corporate surveillance, and communication surveillance.

    • Mac@federation.red
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 hours ago

      If you’ve gone to jail they totally have your prints already. Fingerprints are identifying information for such a thing. How else would they do that?