I used google for most of my life, for the past couple months I’ve been using brave search, but I still end up using google often because google images is far better than brave search images. I’m also worried that maybe brave search isn’t the best choice. What would you guys recommend?

  • Marthirial@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    3 hours ago

    I am paying for Kagi. Has worked well and some searched topics had been human curated so the answers are right there in the results. But it also does a good job with obscure searches, although it seems it tries to alter the meaning or context in order to show more results.

    Best feature is the ability to hide from the results shit sites like Reddit or Quora.

  • Ark-5@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    3 hours ago

    4get.ca lets you select your scraper among pretty much everything else listed here, and it can be themed with my preferred color scheme right out of the box, so it gets my vote.

  • Mwa@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    10 hours ago

    Duckduckgo is the best one, you can also use Startpage andWoogle

    • /home/pineapplelover@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 hour ago

      I’ve jumped around to pretty much all search engines (except kagi) and I’ve settled on and been using duckduckgo for the longest duration out of all the alternatives

      • Mwa@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 hour ago

        Same I stopped using startpage after Google became horrible.

    • chloroken@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      12 hours ago

      I’ve been using DDG for a while but just got hit with an AI summary finally, like Brave and then Google does. It’s such a turn off. I trust the information exactly 0%. Definitely considering just using SearXNG full time now. I liked DDG a lot but I’m so fickle, it doesn’t take much for me to swap.

      • Lemongrab@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        9 hours ago

        You can disable that. Here are two links that disable that. Add it to Firefox or Chromium through the settings.

        Simple, only disables AI answers: https://duckduckgo.com/?kbe=0&q=%s

        Long, disables AI answers and ads: https://duckduckgo.com/?kak=-1&kax=-1&kbe=0&k1=-1&q=%s

        Steps to create a custom DDG search config:

        • Visit: https://duckduckgo.com/settings
        • Select the settings you want, for example dark mode.
        • Click the “Show Bookmarklet and Settings Data” button.
        • Copy the link, using my dark mode scenario would yield the URL https://duckduckgo.com/?kae=d
        • Edit the URL by adding &q=%s to the end, which acts as a placeholder for the browser to replace with your actual search query. Using my example https://duckduckgo.com/?kae=d&q=%s
        • Last step is add it to your browser. May differ between browsers, but generally look in the search engines tab of the settings.
        • chloroken@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 hours ago

          Thanks for the tips but it says that it can be disabled right on the summary itself. The issue isn’t disabling it for me. It’s that the information is bad and I don’t want a search engine that thinks this is useful. Sorry for not making that more clear. That’s what I meant by me being fickle.

  • Rikj000@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    18 hours ago

    SearXNG: https://github.com/searxng/searxng

    It enhances and respects privacy,
    is open source and self hostable,
    and queries multiple configurable search engines (google, bing, brave, duckduckgo, …)

    You can find a list of public hosted instances here:
    https://searx.space/

    However I prefer to slap an instance randomizer on top, so each of my queries goes through another public SearXNG instance, for more privacy, and mostly, to bypass rate-limiting after frequent queries.

    For this I use:

  • Tzeentch@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    18 hours ago

    This is probably the best resource for keeping track of which search engine options exist and what their quality is like: https://seirdy.one/posts/2021/03/10/search-engines-with-own-indexes

    For a “fire and forget” option that doesnt require any configuration you cant go wrong with good ol DuckDuckGo: https://duckduckgo.com

    If you’re okay with dealing with more configuration and breakage then Searx can be pretty powerful as its a metasearch engine that can search with every search engine you tell it at once and agregate the results(while proxying things to maintain privacy): https://searx.space (had decent luck with the https://search.sapti.me instance if you just wanna try it out without searching through a list of options)

    Also all search engines are kinda bad due to SEO spam and “AI” generated images and articles polluting the results, consider using uBlacklist to help you filter out the trash from search results(think of it like ublock origin for search engine results), can use it for basically any search engine so no reason to not set it up: https://github.com/iorate/ublacklist

  • otterpop@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    15 hours ago

    I’ve really been enjoying Kagi. They seem to have a pretty good privacy policy as well. However Searxng is probably the best for privacy since it’s self hosted.

  • twinnie@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    17 hours ago

    I also use DuckDuckGo. If I find I’m not seeing the results I want i just add !g anywhere and the search gets sent over to Google, though I don’t find I need to do that very often.

  • notprogrammer@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    16 hours ago

    I use Brave Search (yeah from the browser) and it works pretty good. Their privacy policy seems fairly robust at least according to my understanding and they have their own index, so they don’t rely on Google or Bing, which allows them to filter out the SEO Spam rampant on other engines.

  • joe_@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    14 hours ago

    I use Bing because it gives points at ~$120/yr sent to the FSF. I asked FSF and they validated that they get what MSFT says they send.

    Regarding more privacy-based search engines, I perceive the privacy argument from corporate search as marketing. Any corporate search engine should be selling your data to maximize profit, even if you pay monthly.

      • Ballissle@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        9 hours ago

        Oh really? I’ll look more into that thanks.

        I saw people mentioning an open source and self hostable search engine (SearXNG) which is cool and I tried it out but it gives not very good results. I tried searching for specific sites and it would show anything but. But it’s fine for general info.

        I still don’t think there is anything else other than startpage that is as private while giving good search results. I don’t believe that startpage is collecting data on users like google/Microsoft do and I don’t think duckduckgo is as good in that regard either. It still makes sense for startpage to be owned by an advertising company since it does show ads mixed with the search results. The difference is they are not personalised or tracked to you (so they say).

        So if you have any evidence of System1/startpage tracking users and collecting personalised data on users for anything other than general usage and diagnostic analytics then I think it’s fine. If you do, then I will stop using and recommending it.