• (⬤ᴥ⬤)@lemmy.blahaj.zoneOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    24 days ago

    i’m going to be charitable and assume that you just don’t know better so here, but you should be aware that equating queer attraction to child molestation is uh. Not Good, actually.

    • Chloé 🥕@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      24 days ago

      “oh, you say you like your partner’s eyes? well do you know who else has eyes? that’s right, BABIES. yikes” (/s)

        • Catoblepas@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          24 days ago

          Hey, if a bunch of queer people tell you that you ignored the obvious on its face reading of a tweet in order to make up something homophobic to get mad about instead, maybe you should listen to them.

          You clearly have no understanding of the matter to begin with if you think twinks are children.

      • (⬤ᴥ⬤)@lemmy.blahaj.zoneOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        21
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        24 days ago

        love have you checked the link? attraction to fat hairy men is a cornerstone of queer culture and history.

        also when i said that comparing queer attraction to pedophilia is bad i wasn’t saying the attraction was bad (it is, don’t get me wrong), i was saying the comparison itself is bad.

        if you have somehow managed to avoid the last half decade of politics– in which case tell me who your geosomnologist is cos i want some of that– the global right-wing has been calling LGBT folks groomers for a while now. so if you make such a comparison yourself not only are you signaling to us that you’re one of them, you’re also signaling it to them too.
        i hope i don’t need to explain why that’s bad

      • fracture [he/him] @beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        24 days ago

        my good person, you need to take a break from the right wing alarm machines

        you are the only one here who is uneducated enough to think that “weight and body hair” are the only signs of post-puberty maturity in men

        a lot of men don’t put on weight well into their 20s, for reasons which are completely explainable without “second puberty”, something you entirely brought into this conversation as a strawman to knock down by yourself

        a lot of men also have trouble growing body hair. not every man is a big hairy fuck (affectionate, as i am a big hairy fuck). also, plenty of men shave their body hair, and it’s still fine to be attracted to them. are you going to start calling straight men pedophiles for being attracted to shaved women???

        you may also note that twinks are famously attractive for being quite muscular, which is very difficult to achieve without the heightened testosterone levels post-puberty

        please stop posting these deliberate false exaggerated takes. it’s really ruining the vibe, tbh

        (ps: second puberty is a thing, but it’s a trans person thing, so it’s not part of this argument)

          • fracture [he/him] @beehaw.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            24 days ago

            you’re being homophobic and kind of racist, too (not all ethnicities grow very much body hair, but apparently being attracted to them would also make you a pedo). so if you’re not right wing, you’re sure acting like it

            i hope you have a really unpleasant day and get banned