alessandro@lemmy.ca to PC Gaming@lemmy.ca · 10 hours agoNintendo's lawsuit against Palworld isn't just bad for the industry, it's bad for Nintendowww.pcgamer.comexternal-linkmessage-square21fedilinkarrow-up191arrow-down16cross-posted to: games@lemmy.world
arrow-up185arrow-down1external-linkNintendo's lawsuit against Palworld isn't just bad for the industry, it's bad for Nintendowww.pcgamer.comalessandro@lemmy.ca to PC Gaming@lemmy.ca · 10 hours agomessage-square21fedilinkcross-posted to: games@lemmy.world
minus-squareDonut@leminal.spacelinkfedilinkarrow-up7arrow-down5·6 hours agoThe article itself admits that it’s hinged on two “substantial what if’s” Just be patient and wait until more information comes out.
minus-squareBaggins [he/him]@lemmy.calinkfedilinkarrow-up6arrow-down1·edit-26 hours agoIf you read the article, those “ifs” are only in reference to whether a US suit will be filed. The analysis of Nintendo’s BS patents all makes sense.
minus-squareWalrusDragonOnABike [they/them]@lemmy.todaylinkfedilinkarrow-up7arrow-down2·6 hours agoWe know it’s a patent suit though. Just because the article focuses on specific patents doesn’t mean those parents are not already ridiculous and that the lawsuit, even if it’s not based on those specific patents, is also ridiculous.
The article itself admits that it’s hinged on two “substantial what if’s”
Just be patient and wait until more information comes out.
If you read the article, those “ifs” are only in reference to whether a US suit will be filed. The analysis of Nintendo’s BS patents all makes sense.
We know it’s a patent suit though. Just because the article focuses on specific patents doesn’t mean those parents are not already ridiculous and that the lawsuit, even if it’s not based on those specific patents, is also ridiculous.