• Danterious@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    22 hours ago

    I’m going to be bold enough to say we don’t have as wide of an AI/LLM issue on the Fediverse as the other platforms will have.

    Why do you think that? I don’t think that there is anything systemic in how the fediverse operates that will stop LLMs polluting the discourse here too. Actually I already think that they are polluting the discourse here.

    Anti Commercial-AI license (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)

    • Melody Fwygon@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      22 hours ago

      The filtration capabilities available to most users is pretty robust; depending on what you use to interact with the Fediverse. I thinik it would be possible to filter out problematic bots, users and even whole domain sources with the right kind of software.

      • Danterious@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        21 hours ago

        Good point. I have been a lot more active in tailoring my experience here compared to other social media. I wish there was more tools for deciding whether or not you want to block someone though. Sometimes its not as simple as just looking at their post history. Also as an aside I wish it was possible to block votes as well so the ranking of the content was also able to be personalized.

        Anti Commercial-AI license (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)

        • Melody Fwygon@lemmy.one
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          21 hours ago

          Such a system might be constructed for one’s own scraping needs by taking any one of the current frontend/backends and customizing that behavior such that it could mitigate issues or ingest/ignore data based on your own inputs as well; such that your model could be “riding along on a human surfboard with human guidance”