• rglullis@communick.news
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    4 months ago

    environment more hostile to discussion and honest exchange.

    “Voting” and “discussion” are separate things. The old forums did not have voting but still had polarization, personal attacks, hellthreads, etc.

    The problem is that Reddit/Facebook turned “voting” from a tool meant to measure “quality” (e.g, this post is relevant to the community, this comment does not add to the discussion) into a tool to measure “popularity” (I agree with this, so I vote up. I don’t like this, so I downvote).

    Either get rid of voting altogether, or let’s bring back a culture where “votes” are meant to signal quality.

    • shadowbert@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      Redditors did that, rather than reddit I’d argue. Still the same result of becoming a far less useful heuristic though.

      Not really sure how to “fix” a system like that, which depends on the masses to do something correctly. They… don’t.

      • SteveFromMySpace@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        4 months ago

        If users are the problem and the platform encourages/enables them to behave like that, then the problem is the platform. Redditors act that way because the system incentivizes it.

        • shadowbert@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          What alternatives to votes would you propose to handle this better? Because I have no doubt the same thing will happen here too…

          It’s just how people work, especially when things get heated. That said, perhaps that’s a poor example as a heated discussion isn’t necessary a helpful/constructive one…

          • SteveFromMySpace@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            4 months ago

            I already said: upvotes only, remove downvotes, votes are public. If we don’t have downvotes public voting is not as important. But if we insist on keeping them, then yes it should be public

            We also need people to be more accepting of stricter/heavier-handed moderation, which is a hard sell.

      • rglullis@communick.news
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        We can fix that by having moderators that can establish clear guidelines and show enough authority and can be trusted by the community. And yes, if the guidelines include something like:

        Downvotes are not for disagreement. It’s fine to downvote if the argument is false or deliberately misleading, but if someone is making a good faith argument that you disagree with, either make a constructive response or simply let it go

        Then the mods would be completely justified to call out users who are drive-by downvoting.

        • AchtungDrempels@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          Or some self entitled 3rd party admin would do that just because they’d feel like people owed them explanations.

          • rglullis@communick.news
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            4 months ago

            Hey, do I owe you anything for all the space I’m taking in your head or am I still living rent-free?

            • AchtungDrempels@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              4 months ago

              If you did it would not be rent free, or would it, einstein. But no worry, i don’t think about you, just this topic and your enthusiasm for it triggered my reply :)

              Have a downvote for going off topic and “personal”.

              • rglullis@communick.news
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                4 months ago

                You are the one pontificating in my comment, and I am the one going personal. Seems like your reasoning is as good as your reading comprehension.

                But hey, thanks for stopping by!

        • shadowbert@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          But… we had those on reddit. I didn’t see many actual examples of the “moderator gone power crazy” stereotype that is so often echoed there (especially by people who fully deserved the moderator action they received).

          The issue wasn’t that the rules were clear. The issue was that people refused to read them in the first place, and became hyper-defensive and obstinate whenever they were called out on it, even by moderators.

          • rglullis@communick.news
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 months ago

            No moderator went on to call out users who were down voting for disagreement, because this data is not public on Reddit.

      • rglullis@communick.news
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        Meta-moderation and multi-dimensional voting. We were happier with slashdot and we took it for granted.