9:07am and tell me to return 15 minutes after and I’d be pulling out my phone every 5 seconds and doing math.

Is it really so hard to add 15?

Not to mention they’re worse at keeping time.

You know, like the whole point of a watch.

So you have to fiddle with the volume less on vinyl?

That’s the one good selling point I’ve heard for vinyl so far.

You can only steal investor money if you’re already rich and the investment is coming from the government.

Neat.

Owner. It’s what the owner is taking, and usually they’re working way less than everyone else.

That user base is a drop in the ocean compared to most of reddits user base, and those people have all left already.

deleted by creator

deleted by creator

This is a contributor post, not a Forbes official article.

I read here recently that the rich people who pay attention to Forbes for investment information avoid all Forbes contributor content and focus only official article from Forbes staff.

I don’t know how true that is, but if you believe it then until a forbes staffer writes about it in an official capacity, it hasn’t actually hit Forbes.

Consumables are always the best gifts. I don’t even bother with anything else anymore, unless it’s something that I made myself because then it has sentimental value.

Before tablets, parents didn’t survive.

The target being the executives who will approve the marketer’s work.

So the developers claim, but the users still encounter it, and the bug report stays open for 22 years … possibly more.

So what are they doing that illegal that other apps aren’t doing?

Removed by mod

So what are they doing that illegal that other apps aren’t doing??

I really don’t know how to be any more clear with this question.

I read the article too, and those things you quoted sound to me like things every app does.

Hence my question: what is different here?

Oh but the word mankind in itself overlooks women. We’re all supposed to be saying humankind now.

There’s not a word in this article about why this breach of privacy matters while others do not. It’s not stated whether this was in the terms of service for the app, and whether those terms were ruled against.

All kinds of apps have been selling personal information for a long time, and it’s been ruled before that it’s allowed if they have the proper legalese in the terms of service. Did this app just not have any terms of service?

Why is it a breach of privacy for this app, but other apps doing the same selling of personal data is not?