• Grumble@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    1 year ago

    Let’s give this a more reasonable title: “Stephen Miller Launches Advertising Campaign / Fundraiser Using Meritless Lawsuit”

  • joshuanozzi@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    1 year ago

    I hope the judge’s rejection of this quivering jelly dildo’s tantrum is a fun and sarcastic read.

    • mrbubblesort@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yeah, I’d love to see them play the uno reverse and say “all right, we agree, no christian products, no jewish, no muslim, no jesus christmas items, not even a kosher pickle” for like a day or so, search and replace lgbtq with religion, then counter sue him and the “investor” he’s representing with the same suit.

    • timespace@sedd.it
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I don’t think they are remotely equivalent.

      One is about acceptance, equality, loving thyself and thy neighbor, and isn’t making anyone something they aren’t already. The other is disgusting, evil, vile, and actually harmful for young brains.

      • DarkGamer@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’m amused that you wrote that in a way that each side will assume they are the accepting, neighbor-loving side you’re talking about.

  • o_o@artemis.camp
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    1 year ago

    Ok, but who has the money? The parents, who care what they sell in the store, isn’t that what “capitalism” is all about? Let the market decide, stop getting butt hurt about everything and anything.

  • OhStopYellingAtMe@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Propaganda is ‘biased information to promote a political point of view.’

    LBGTQ is not political. It’s just a personal lifestyle preference.

    The only people making it political are dipshits like Stephen Miller.

  • ArugulaZ@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’m sick to my ass of Meager-mind. Hell, even his parents won’t talk to him, because even they see him for what we all know him to be… a dangerous fascist.

    • thefartographer@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      The problem, exemplified by Rudy Ghouliani, is that the spray-on hair and cheap dye jobs will run down your face when you sweat. Often, sweat runs into your eyes. And as you can probably guess, when that sweat contains dye products, you get dye running right into your eyeballs.

      And then you can Nazi.

  • comedy@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    Dude has 216 shares, out of 460.9 million outstanding shares of Target. Even if Target has to pay for the loss of value in share price (they won’t), they could pay this dude without breaking a sweat. Also, Stephen Miller is a Nazi.

    • resin85@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Assuming he can convince someone that the 52 week high represents what the stock should be worth, that’s a (181-130)*216 = $11,016 loss. What a joke. I hope he’s laughed out of court and they have to pay Target’s lawyers.

  • Nougat@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    So … the shitty people are seeking damages because they say Target failed to recognize how shitty they are?

  • Dom Poose@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Hol’up.

    First they caused an uproar protesting rainbow “LGBQT” shirts that have been sold for many years now…

    Now they’re pissed off their uproar caused their shitbag friends/investors to lose money?

  • evatronic@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    So the crux of the suit appears to be a claim that the Board of Target lied when it said it monitored social media, by “only monitoring one side”.

    All Target has to do is demonstrate they monitored social media in a side-agnostic fashion and this is done in like, summary judgement.